Find a Lawyer

HAJI versus STATE

The appreciation of the evidence of Sections 2?2 (b), 6 33R and 7 337R was not sufficient to cancel the prosecution case in the following circumstances, the delay of filing the FIR was sufficient for the reason of the recovery of the shotgun on the accused. Cannot be doubted. Police did not produce a separate memo of the revelations, especially when the recovery witness, as well as the recovery witness, also disclosed that the suspect had been investigating the concealment of the crime, which was widely prosecuted. Happened in the day The brother of the injured eye witness was already known for arguing. The eyewitnesses were not interesting witnesses and made strong and coherent statements, unless the method of firing was possible by the accused and the victim. A female witness was involved in hurting her husband because of her husband's murder and because of this, one of his eyes was also convicted and the accused was kept in custody. law websites from Mangowal lawyer