MUHAMMAD YUSUF versus THE STATE
Sections 514 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Applicants confiscating Section 337F bailiffs do not waive their legal obligation to ensure the preparation of the accused before the court. Arriving, as before, the accused appeared before the court and surrendered himself on the same date as needed and second, after that the court again admitted them on interim bail before arrest. Thus, after the rule of consistency and logic, they were barred from taking any preventive action against them. In all fairness there was only one way, so it was that the applicants should be treated with the same kind of welfare and gentleness, the mechanical way of imposing a fine through this illegal order, Was demonstrated, was illegal. Due to the facts and circumstances of the case being arbitrary and seductive, the review request was allowed to set aside the invalid order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Sargodha lawyer