RAB NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Section 2/2/343434 Investigation of evidence dismissed counsel, trickery and false alternatives in the immediate registration of the FIR. Although the eyewitnesses were related to the victim, they had no enmity with the accused and their presence on the site was natural and accurate. With the help of medical evidence, the High Court had properly appreciated and reviewed the case and, after considering it in a juxtaposition in the prosecution's case, rightly rejected the defense application for grave and sudden provocation. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Bhimbar lawyer