Supreme Court Azad Kashmir — Judgments of 1972

12 reported judgments of the Supreme Court Azad Kashmir from 1972.

  • LAL KHAN AND ANOTHER v. SARKAR 1972 PLD 1

    Extra Evidence on Criminal Procedure (CR PC) Sections 375, 428 and 540 Extra Evidence Limiting Evidence on Court Powers…

  • MUHAMMAD DIN v. ZABARDAST KHAN AND ANOTHER 1972 PLD 7

    The appearance and non-submission of the parties to the CPC result in the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of O IX, r 8, the date set for the purpose of determining certain mutual matters for the holding…

  • MST. ZAREEFA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 1972 PLD 14

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 488 (1) disregards the word \ meaning that maintaining your husband's spouse shall be neglected in maintaining the meaning of such duty violation.…

  • MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. KHAWAJA HABIB JOO 1972 PLD 22

    Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI of General OCP, General 17 of the CPC, a new trial in a modification of a case or a change of reason for a new relief or procedure, or a legal right of a party to the …

  • GUL ZAMAN v. SHER ZAMAN AND OTHERS 1972 PLD 26

    Evidence Act 1872 Sections 107 and 108 The burden of proving the death of a person and the purpose of life, and the purposes of Articles 107 and 108, are more and more embodied in the seven-year reali…

  • A. K. ANSARI v. THE STATE 1972 PLD 38

    Section 352 and section 491 read with the Official Secrets Act (XIX of 1923), section 491, section 14 proceedings in camera Section 352, CR PC only applies to cases against a person under section 491.…

  • GHULAM QADIR v. SARKAR 1972 PLD 42

    Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 514 Bond Verification of Guaranteed Guarantee of Bond Forfeiture Regulations, Conduct not implemented under the Bond Code and therefore attracted the application…

  • SARDAR MUHAMMAD YASIN KHAN, ADVOCATE v. RAJA FEROZE KHAN 1972 PLD 46

    Contract Act 1872 Section 23 Public Policy Meaning The contract does not deprive a victim of justice from the court at all, but prevents the criminal from initiating a criminal proceeding, but does no…

  • JAN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER v. MALIK ABDUL KARIM 1972 PLD 59

    The complaint read with sections 242 and 903 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) was dismissed for dismissal under the complainant's absence, after dismissing the accused as dismissal. Runs and a…

  • AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT v. BRIG. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN 1972 PLD 70

    Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Of CPC temporary injections and interlocutory orders A XXXIX, rr 1 and 2 must not be interim mergers where financial compensation can be given There is no evidence on …

  • BRIG. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF AZAD J & K 1972 PLD 80

    Provisional injunction and interlocutory injunction of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXIX A. XXXX Nevertheless, the Arbitration Act (X of 1940), section 41, has not yet been approved.…

  • MUHAMMAD YUSUF v. GUL MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS 1972 PLD 90

    Civil Code 1908 Section 96 of the Code of Conduct A person cannot appeal to any decree as a general rule unless he was a party to the proceedings or such behavior is not a legal representative of this…

Other years — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1963 · 1962 · 1958 · 1957 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.