Supreme Court Azad Kashmir — Judgments of 1966
13 reported judgments of the Supreme Court Azad Kashmir from 1966.
- MST. ZADHA BEGUM ALIAS ZARDA BEGUM ETC. v. MUHAMMAD NAZIR KHAN 1966 PLD 1
The Mohammedan Law Guardian Divorce Prohibition does not relate to the minor daughter within the marriage contract; her right to custody of the minor has been lost, which is why she is not considered …
- SAID MUHAMMAD ETC. v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF ETC. 1966 PLD 5
The Code of Conduct 1908 is considered pending in the court under section 151 case law (Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and Law Code, 1949, Section 2). Gives For bringing your old trial file for process…
- KH. MUHAMMAD AKBAR BUTT v. AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS 1966 PLD 10
Articles 96 and 104 of the Code of Civil Code 1908 and A XLIII, r 1 read with OX, r 8 rejecting the plaintiff's default claim before the court but at the same time making false and ridiculous cases. H…
- SAID MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF ETC. 1966 PLD 13
Civil Procedure Code Order III, R 4 (2) of the CPC Accredited Agents and Pliers II II hangs the plaintiff's attorney in favor of a lawyer without restriction in respect of the law in writing The optio…
- SYED LALL SHAH ETC. v. AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT 1966 PLD 15
Civil Procedure Code CPCII of the CPC Suite by Paupers O XXXIII, r 1 & O XLIV, r 1 The suit or appeal in the pharmacy that cannot be initially established in the pharma pauperis in such form May be al…
- AZAD J & K GOVERNMENT v. KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD USMAN & CO. 1966 PLD 19
Include all types of objections in the grounds of section 30 and 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, in the grounds or section 30 (c) of section 30, in the event of non-acceptance, in the scope of the ar…
- AZAD J. & K. GOVERNMENT v. SAYED MOHAMMAD YOUNIS SHAH GILLANI 1966 PLD 31
The Court Fees Act 1870 section 7 (xii) read with SH II, Article 17 Declaratory suit the plaintiff alleges that the order to terminate his services was in violation of law and police rules, he was out…
- AZAD J & K GOVERNMENT v. SHER BAZ 1966 PLD 38
Offices 23 and 23A (3) (d) Establishment of the Office of Federal Ombudsman Order 1983 under section 23, under penalty of imprisonment of less than three years under section 23. Cannot order detention…
- HABIB v. SARKAR 1966 PLD 42
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 300 and 302 are accused of committing a serious blow to the neck of the accused, resulting in immediate death, on the contrary, in the absence of special circumstances…
- ARSALA KHAN v. GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN 1966 PLD 47
Evidence Act 1872 Sections 91, 92 and 99 Oral evidence should not be accepted unless it encourages conviction that the fact that oral evidence is baseless is not sufficient to accept that contradict e…
- SOHBAT ALI AND OTHERS v. FAQAR DIN 1966 PLD 51
Civil Code 1908 Section 149 of the Code can be used at any stage to meet the reduction of judicial fees only if the failure to pay judicial fees is due to a major mistake or doubt or poverty or ignora…
- MEHRAM SHAH v. MST. RASHIDA BEGUM AND OTHERS 1966 PLD 59
CPC's generally amended civil procedure code order VI VI r 17 of O VI protects only the right that a party has already received at an interval, only to increase the request for limitation. The right c…
- AZAD J. & K. GOVERNMENT v. ALLAH DITTA 1966 PLD 66
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 read with Section 9 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Government, the appointment of a servant or the decision of the competent authority on the sanctity not in a…
Other years — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1963 · 1962 · 1958 · 1957 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.