Sindh Chief Court — Judgments of 1956

94 reported judgments of the Sindh Chief Court from 1956.

  • SIR E. HAROON JAFFAR & SONS LTD v. HAJI E. DOSSA & SONS 1956 PLD 4

    The Arbitration Act 1940 section 34 should be denied in a trial where the first case of fraud or where the accused of fraud is not wanted is a free or fair investigation.…

  • HABIBUR RAHMAN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 9

    Failure to comply with or comply with the provisions of Sections 262 and 537 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 256 of the CR PC Trial if the failure to investigate the accused under Sectio…

  • USMAN BHAI v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 25

    The Sindh (Land Application) Act, 1947, Section 299, Government of India Act, 1935 has not been declared invalid, nor by the fact that the acquisition of immovable property is not mentioned in the Pro…

  • MESSRS. MUHAMMAD ALI TRAMWAYS CO. v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 37

    Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary Injections and Interlocutory Orders O XXXIX, r 1 The principals approved a temporary injunction, stating that the injury was approved in the form of criminal…

  • MST. KHURSHID JAMAL v. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR QURESHI 1956 PLD 47

    Mohammedan Law Dover Rate Exchange on which Dover Loan should be calculated in case of Dover forex settlement…

  • THE TATTERSALLS CLUB v. S. M. SULEMAN 1956 PLD 49

    CPC Parties Civil Procedure Code Order I Suits OI, r 8 The Secretary of the Swat Unregistered Club has been directed by the Plaintiff to take notice of all members of the Club Directive published in n…

  • JAMAL PARVEZ v. SYED SAFDAR HUSSAIN NAQVI 1956 PLD 55

    Code of Conduct 1908 Section 80 mandatory notice is required where a government officer can claim what he did for his position, although the court may, on further consideration, conclude that the act …

  • ABDUL WAHAB v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 62

    Government Indemnity Act 1935 Section 240 (3) Temporary employee is not required to take notice under section 240 (3) of the service as per contract.…

  • QAZI MIR MUHAMMAD v. MESSRS. M. N. SYNDICATE 1956 PLD 71

    Section 69 (3) of the Partnership Act 1932 is not capable of acting under section 14 arbitration act (X of 1940)…

  • SHER ALI v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 73

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 423 (2) must be a serious factor in interfering with the jury's wrongful appeal court decision.…

  • THE CROWN v. RAHIM BUX 1956 PLD 75

    Sections 435 and 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) generally should not interfere with the automobile if the accused can request the defendant's request for the intervention of the criminal…

  • THE CROWN v. MUNAWAR JEHAN BEGUM 1956 PLD 77

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 439 Penalties when justifying a conviction is not justified unless it is expressly or grossly inadequate, or leads to a misunderstanding of justice or an improp…

  • SHOIB HUSSAIN HAMEEDI v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 80

    Security of Pakistan Act 1952 Section 6 Detention Detention as a Basis of Information Disorder Test: Whether information is sufficient for effective representation for detente…

  • OMAR v. HAJI RAZZAK 1956 PLD 85

    CPC Appeals from the XLI Original Decisions of the Civil Procedure Code Order O XL will determine the recipient of the Partnership Property Court if the defendant fails to deny that the plaintiff is a…

  • FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. KHADIM HUSSAIN 1956 PLD 93

    Govt. Of India Act 1935 Section 240 (3) Appeal for the temporary role of appointment of a Government employee at the appeal phase is not allowed to proceed.…

  • SIRAJ FAROOQI v. PIR ELAHI BUX CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. 1956 PLD 95

    Section 54 of the Operative Society Act 1925 Section 54 Some Defendants are not members of the Society or claiming by members that the Section, Conduct, Disallow Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 3…

  • FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. ABDUL MAJID OPEL 1956 PLD 96

    Parties to the Articles 5, 9 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 contained the Reaction and Challenge Agreement, and even then the arbitration dispute reference was canceled.…

  • PIR ILLAHI BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD AYOOB KHUHRO 1956 PLD 101

    Section 3 Disqualification Order The Governor-General does not have the authority to amend the General Clauses Act (X of 1897), section 21.…

  • SHAMSUDDIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 133

    C Customs Act 1878 Section 167 (8), read with notification number 51 dated December 27, 1950, confiscating gold warrants Government of India Act, 1935, section 226…

  • S. A. SATTAR v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 138

    In respect of Section 145 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 145, the immovable property of Pakistan (Administration for Homeland) Ordinance (XV of 1949), has no jurisdiction to pass any o…

  • MST. ZAREL BIBI v. SHAMSULDIN KHAN 1956 PLD 150

    By CBC Suite Civil Procedure Code Order XXXII Units for Minors and Non-Missed Persons, or XXXII, r 7 Minors Agree to Refer to Arbitration Without Release of Court Invalid Arbitration Procedure And suc…

  • WARISALI KHAN KHATTAK v. THE UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 1956 PLD 155

    Valid application against the provisions of section 115 of the Legal Evidence Act (1 of 1872)…

  • HAJI DAULATBAI v. HAJI ABDUL KHALIK NIJAT, IRANI 1956 PLD 161

    Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVIII, R5 before the judicial verdict before the judicial verdict, in order to be successful, the applicant must first prove the case and the intended intention, r 5 in th…

  • LAKHMICHAND MALIK v. AZIZ-UR-REHMAN 1956 PLD 167

    Order read with Pakistan (Federal Capital Establishment) Order 1948 Article 6 Notification No 1 / 2A / 48, Administrator dated 23 July 1948, Karachi is not authorized to assign revision powers under s…

  • REFERENCE UNDER S. 12, SIND COURTS\' ACT, v. REFERENCE UNDER S. 12, SIND COURTS\' ACT, 1956 PLD 178

    Government of India Act 1935 Schedule VII, List II, Items 9 and 21qu Acquisition land The Land Acquisition Sindh application, Land Ordinance (111 of 1947) and the Certification of Land Act (XLVI of 19…

  • RAMCHAND THAWERDAS v. THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL-IN-COUNCIL 1956 PLD 189

    Pakistan (Administration for Equity Property) Ordinance 1949 Section 34 Joint Hindu Family Property was acquired by the Government of India in 1941, whose compensation amount was cleared in the appeal…

  • MEMON TAYAB SHARIF v. KASAM ADAMJI 1956 PLD 195

    Arbitration Act 1940 Section 30 and Para 3, SH Award four months ahead…

  • BARKAT SHAH v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 198

    The Karachi Control of Disciplinary Persons Act 1952 Section 2 (as amended by the Act (XX of 1953)) was designated as an additional district magistrate but those which were not given the powers of the…

  • AIJAZ BEGUM v. BUNYAD HASAN PARDESI 1956 PLD 201

    Majority Act 1875 Section 2, CL (a) This process also involves the ability of a minor Muslim girl to sue her for dissolving a marriage without a close friend.…

  • MUHAMMAD MOHSIN SIDDIQI v. (CHIEF JUDGE, KARACHI, SMALL CAUSES COURT 1956 PLD 203

    The City Municipal Act 1933 reads with Sections 17 (1) CL3 and 17 (2) of CL3 Regulation 6, CL (1), voting in one booth to another, illegal…

  • KHALIQ HUSSAIN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 212

    Such facts may be refused to question some of the facts presented in the evidence against the Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 342.…

  • M. N. BAKER v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 217

    Pakistan Rehabilitation Rules 1951 Contents of the Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance (XIX of 1948), Section 8 (2) (b) Notice of Rehabilitation Ordinance Rules It is not necessary to state the reasons …

  • MUHAMMAD ABDUL QAYYUM SIDDIQI v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 234

    The Evidence Act 1872 Proof Art (I of 1872), the opinion of a Section 45 handwriting expert is not unbelievable…

  • WALI MUHAMMAD v. BADRUL JALIL, RENT CONTROLLER, ASSISTANTREHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1956 PLD 250

    Under the Government of India Act, 1935, Section 223 Section 8 (2) (B), the Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance (XIX of 1948), the writ against mandamus against the removal of the restorative authority …

  • RIAZ AHMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD YUSUF KHAN 1956 PLD 253

    The Karachi Rent Restriction Act, 1953, Sindh Land Restriction Act (X of 194), the landlord has been instructed by the landlord to pass the Karachi Rent Restriction Ordinance ( I 1953) in his postpone…

  • HAJI IMAM BUX v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 262

    The Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), used on the request for Section 439 jurisdictional transfer, and on the request for transfer to the Chief Justice, the proceedings…

  • A. MIRZAZADA v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 273

    The Pakistan Penal Code Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 383 threatened the criminal charges received by the police and the threat of false imprisonment, however, made the basis for allegations of br…

  • ISMAIL A. MUNSHEY v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 288

    Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), appealed to the High Court by a single judge, to appeal the section 411 appeal for contempt of court, not the inherent jurisdiction o…

  • SIDDIQ WAHAB v. SYED IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, (RETURNING OFFICER, FOR THEINTERIM WEST PAKISTAN ASSEMBLY ELECTION 1956 PLD 291

    Rules of the Bench of Chief Justice, Transfer of Case of Chief Justice Exchanging Case from One Bench to Another Case Except for any other Bench or any interlocutory order passed, the Sindh Chief Cour…

  • HABIB AHMED v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI 1956 PLD 295

    Security of Pakistan Act 1952 Security of Pakistan Act (XXXV of 1952), Section 3 (1) (c) of the Act for the exterior section and nothing else was disregarded as a result of the external order.…

  • MST. WADHUL v. BAGHALI 1956 PLD 298

    The dissolution of the Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 (VIII of the Muslim Marriages Act, VIII of 1939), Section 2 (ii) for two years is not sufficient for the restoration of the wife, irrespective of wh…

  • SHABBIR HASAN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 301

    The Security Order of Pakistan Act 1952 (XXXV of the Pakistan Act of 1952), Section 3 (7), passed the preliminary detention order on the basis of ideological error and fresh order. (XXXV of 1952), the…

  • SIND BRICKS SYNDICATE v. TAHILRAMANI 1956 PLD 305

    The Operative Society Act 1925 is read with the Bombay Operative Society Act (VIII of 1925), Sections 3 (1) (e) Sections 72, 51 and 70. Being registered in Section 3 means Section 72 registered by the…

  • ABDUL SATTAR v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 310

    Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 349 offense under section 349, especially for a person convicted of a crime because of the amount of PPC that has been misused…

  • DA WOOD v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI 1956 PLD 313

    Security of Pakistan Act 1952 Security of Pakistan Act (XXXV of 1952), Section 3 (1) (c) External order porting was adopted on the basis of public safety and public management but the fact is that mai…

  • FARID SONS LTD v. THE KARACHI COTTON ASSOCIATION LTD. 1956 PLD 315

    Words and phrases Words and phrases can be distinguished before using them…

  • (FIRM OF) ERWANJEE BOMANJEE DALAL & SONS v. SULLEMAN AHMAD, (2) LLOYDS BANK LTD.KARACHI 1956 PLD 321

    Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 60, 64 The plaintiff's current account before the judgment, the bank was found to be fraudulent after paying the judgment debt to a…

  • (COMMANDER) M. S. IBRAT v. THE COMMANDING OFFICER, H. M. P.SDILAWAR AND H. M. P. S. BAHADUR RESPONDENT & THE CROWN 1956 PLD 324

    Criminal Code of Conduct in the Bank (CR PC) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Articles 60, 64 The present account of the defendant, which is attached to the judgment before the judgment, was paid by t…

  • MESSRS. ESMAIL ABDUL SATTAR & BROS., KARACHI v. MICHAL ASSELY 1956 PLD 329

    Civil Procedure Code Order III (V of 1908), O III, r 4 (2) and r 5, O VII, r 23 and O XLI, r 38 (3) of the CPC recognized agents and applicants Power of attorney is not determined by the council court…

  • MRS. DINA SOHRAB KATRAK v. MR. S. ASHHAD ALI AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER, KARACHI 1956 PLD 331

    Sindh (Land Request) Act 1947 Section 2 (f) 3, (1) of the Sindh (Land Application) Act, 1947 does not include the provision of residential accommodation for public servants in the public purpose which…

  • MIRA KHAN v. MEHARBAN HUSAIN 1956 PLD 338

    Sindh (Land Request) Act 1947 Sindh (Land Application) Ordinance (111 of 1947) and Sindh (Land Application) Act (XLVI of 1947) Rules for the purpose of the Provincial Legislature for the purpose of ra…

  • RAMZAN v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 350

    Evidence Act (1 of 1872), section 27 after the discovery of the dead body is inadmissible…

  • SERAJUL ISLAM v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND SIX OTHERS 1956 PLD 354

    The Government of India Act, 1935, disallows employment opportunities for employing citizens with 240 citizenship. Section 240 of the Government of India Act 1935 requires that the employee cannot be …

  • MESSER. HAJI MOOSA HAJI OMAR AND OTHERS v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 356

    Government of India Act 1935 Government of India Act, 1935, section 226 sub-clause (1) matters relating to public revenue The High Court has no jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908) O VII, Rules…

  • ASGHAR ALI v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 359

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), section 260 (1) (e) authorizing a magistrate to attempt a crime as specified under section 403 PPC, above the prescribed Tender sect…

  • SHAH BANO BEGUM v. IFTIKHAR MUHAMMED KHAN 1956 PLD 363

    Evidence Act (of 1872), section 78, sub-clause in a foreign country when a copy of a public document is acceptable, Section 78, sub-clause 6 of the Evidence Act requires that a copy of a public docume…

  • SIDIQ WAHAB v. SYED IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, RETURNING OFFICER, FOR THE INTERIM WEST PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 371

    Establishment of the West Pakistan Act, 1955, Article 12 (6) of section 12 is not restricted to the writ of jurisdiction of section 12 (6), the establishment of West Pakistan Act 1953 is not a bar to …

  • QASIM v. DRIGH ROAD CANTONMENT BOARD 1956 PLD 377

    City Municipal Act 1933 Cantonment Act (II of 1924), Section 60 read with Karachi City Municipal Act (X 111 of 1932), Section 96 (2) (a) Vehicles are not kept within the limits of the cantonment but r…

  • RASUL BUX AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 381

    The Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), the unconstitutional discretion to grant bail to the Section 498 High Court, is prohibited after the pledge of a session for general rule murder, with the full …

  • THE CROWN v. BABU AND OTHERS 1956 PLD 385

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 494 Words / Consent Special Special magistrate allows the government to change its discretion, withdrawal even if consent is…

  • ABDUR RAHMAN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 389

    Proceedings of the Evidence Act (I of 1872), after the recording of section 24 confessions by the magistrate…

  • MIANDAD v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 390

    Under Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), section 486 (480) (1) of the contempt of court cases can be appealed even if the person other than the accused can appeal under Section 486 of the Criminal Pr…

  • HAJI ABDUL WAHAB v. KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 1956 PLD 391

    CPC Parties' Civil Procedure Code Order I Suite Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O 1, Rule 10 (2) is appropriate for the parties involved in the skate to be appropriate, even if questions between the pa…

  • JAN MUHAMMAD v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 395

    The Pakistan Penal Code, Criminal Code (h 1898), applies even to cases of criminal conspiracy, such as conspiracy to control, in terms of section 180, Criminal PC, as section 120A, pp. C was not inser…

  • NOORJEHAN BEGUM v. MUFTI MUHAMMAD SAMI 1956 PLD 397

    The Guardians and Wards Act 1890 The Guardian and Wards Act (VII of 1890), section 25 word custody only means actual custody or constructive custody. In the sense of being a protector…

  • MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN & CO. v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 402

    Railway Act 1890 Railway Act (IX of 1890), Section 77 Amended by Act VII of 1948, Section 80, Notice to the Railway Manager respecting the requirements of the Civil PC.…

  • DIN MUHAMMAD v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI 1956 PLD 407

    Press (Emergency Powers) Act 1931 Press (Emergency Powers) Act, (XXIII of 1931), Section 4 (1) (d) Whether the Governor of the Province may be called the Provincial Government General Clause Act (X of…

  • SEIGFRIED FORSTNER v. MISS. SUNNO D. J. SOPARIWALA AND THE CROWN 1956 PLD 421

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 426 Transfer of Case An opinion expressed by a magistrate on judicially recorded evidence expresses the opinion of a transfer of …

  • MOOSA BHAI VELJI v. HAJI SALEH MUHAMMAD JAMAL 1956 PLD 423

    Sindh Rent Restriction Act, 1947 Transfer of Property Act, (IV of 1882), Section 106 Notice If the tenants vacate premises at or before the end of the month, the appropriate notice is the Sindh Rent R…

  • RETURNING OFFICER, KARACHI MUMICIPAL CORPORATION v. HAFIZ MUHAMMAD HABIBULLAH 1956 PLD 429

    CPC Temporarily Injections and Interlocutory Orders Civil Procedure Code Order XXXXX, OXLI, r…

  • SONO v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 437

    Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 561A Advocate is unable to appear in court on a fixed date which is properly notified for hearing whether the High Court has …

  • KHAWAJA HYDER JAFFERY v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 440

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 526 Sitting with a Judge of a Court Under Chapter XXIII Sitting with the Jury to hear the Sessions Case, Whether Subject to …

  • SADRUDDI-N A. KHEMANI v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 445

    The Evidence Act of 1872, the Evidence Act (I of 1872), provides for the compensation of loss of goods entrusted to the plaintiff to the plaintiff when the facts are in the knowledge of any person, es…

  • MST. SARAN v. ALI MUHAMMAD 1956 PLD 451

    The Guardians and Wards Act 1890 The Gardens and Wards Act (1111 of 1811), section 25 sets the jurisdiction of the court of residence for the minor to be a minor, whether in the custody of the minor o…

  • ABDUL RAZAK v. MUHAMMAD MULLER 1956 PLD 454

    The Gardens and Wards Act 1890 defines an order sitting under the principal civil jurisdiction of the chief civil jurisdiction of a single judge of the Chief Court of Sindh in the Section 47 Expressio…

  • MUHAMMAD ZAHIR v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 461

    Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 271 (i) Claims to commence trial words These words refer to when the court referred to trial in sub-section (i) of section 271…

  • MUHAMMAD WAFATI v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1956 PLD 464

    Special Relief Act of Government of India Act 1935 (I of 1877), section 42, under the Declaration of Further Relief that the dismissal of the job was void and invalid even if the claimant was entitled…

  • MEHARDIL ELAHIBUX v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN,THE DOMINION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 1956 PLD 468

    Indian Freedom (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order 1947 Civil Procedure Code (VS 1908), Section 80 Notice Secretary, Railway Board addressed whether it is good and Section Indian Freedom (Rights,…

  • RASHID v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER KARACHI 1956 PLD 474

    Government India Act 1935, Section 223 Prohibited Lie Where the jurisdiction granted by the Tribunal is the Patent Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894), Section 17 (I) Notification for the acquisition of …

  • RAHIM BUX v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 475

    In the present case, the High Court amended its decision but the decision was not yet signed or signed in the following circumstances, the accused was charged under Section 302/34, PPC, but the sessio…

  • FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. MRS. MEHRABAI JEHANGIR BAPUJI 1956 PLD 482

    Civil Procedure Code of Code 1908 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 151 and O. XLIII, (1) (d) Appeal for refusing to uphold the ex parte decree, whether to stay in the Appellate Court approved …

  • FASIHUDDIN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 483

    Pakistan Panel Code Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 A Government servant accepts his pleasures when it can be said whether or not to offer section 161 with satisfaction.…

  • MUHAMMAD HASHIM v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 485

    Balochistan Public Safety Regulation 1947 Balochistan Public Safety Regulation (Section I of 1947), Section 3 (5A) (1) As the words may be, the question is whether the foundations were soon accessed t…

  • (COL.) F. S. WAHID-UD-DIN v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 489

    Pakistan Panel Code Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 24 25 and 409 must be distinguished from fraudulent misconduct. Like the deception set forth in Section 25, the PPC Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sec…

  • SHEIKH ABDUL HAMID v. MUHAMMAD MASHOOQ ALI KHAN 1956 PLD 509

    Sindh Rent Restriction Act 1947 Sind Sindh Rent Restriction Act (XX of 1947), Section 20 (1) (2) (5) Chief Judge, Small Causes Court Review, S, 20 (1) Under Ultra Virus…

  • MESSRS. BAWANY VIOLIN TEXTILE MILLS LTD v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & KARACHI TEXTILE LABOUR UNION 1956 PLD 512

    The award is not limited to the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), given by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947), sections 2 (b), 11 and 17 awards issued by a pers…

  • SARDAR GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN v. KH. SHAMSUDDIN 1956 PLD 514

    Transfer of Property Act of 1882 (I82 of I82), Section 55 (2) Contracts for the transfer of the rights of the leasehold in the plot of land as well as the seller of the plot structure does not have su…

  • MRS. PARVEEN BEGUM v. RAJA MUHAMMAD SARWAR KHAN 1956 PLD 521

    Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX CPC Temporary Injunctions and Interlocutory Orders Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XXXIX, r 1 Temporary Prohibited Jurisdiction, to show the plaintiff in the special …

  • RAFIUDDIN v. MR. ALI JAWAD, CITY AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICTMAGISTRATE KARACHI. & SYED TUFFAZULHUSS AIN 1956 PLD 529

    The Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) complies with the provisions of the Bombay District Police Act (IV of 1890), section 43, order for the closure of buildings for indefinite period, under section 107,…

  • FASIHUDDIN v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 531

    Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Government Employees Function Offensive of Business for which money was accepted is not guilty of crime under Section 161, PPC, Application fo…

  • MAULANA ABDUL QUDDOS BIHARI v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI 1956 PLD 533

    The Security of Pakistan Act, 1952, the Securities of Pakistan Act (XXXV of 1952), Section 3 (I) (c) duplicated the grounds of failure of the Act to grant an improper prohibition order to Arts 4, 7 an…

  • MALIK NISAR AHMED v. THE CROWN 1956 PLD 535

    The Hoarding and Black Market Act 1948 reads with the Hoarding and Black Market Act (XXIX of 1948), section 3 section 2 (2) (c) (ii), to sell a motor tire to a person whose name was not in the permit …

  • MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, KARACHI 1956 PLD 538

    Government of India Act 1935 Government of India Act, 1935, Sections 240 (2) (3) of Sections 240 and 243, which are available to the subordinate ranks of the police except on the one hand to the exten…

  • BALOO v. THE STATE 1956 PLD 579

    Pakistan Panel Code Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 84 Legal Insanity There is a difference between medical insanity and legal insanity if a person is capable of knowing the nature of his act or wha…

Other years — Sindh Chief Court

1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.