Labour Court Punjab — Judgments of 1976
145 reported judgments of the Labour Court Punjab from 1976 — page 2 of 2.
- ABDUR RASHID v. KHAN OIL MILLS, SARGODHA 1976 PLC(CS) 776
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 14, Proviso Return and Restoration Oil Mills are operating seasonally but are not listed in Section 4 of t…
- CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. KHALIQ-UZ-ZAMAN 1976 PLC(CS) 779
Domestic Inquiry Must Be Independent A person can be a witness to the incident A person who cannot be an Independent Inquiry Officer West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders…
- PREMIER CLOTH MILLS LTD. v. KHURSHID BIBI 1976 PLC(CS) 780
Sections 25A and 36D of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 obtained the Labor Court results contrary to the record evidence so were excluded.…
- AHMAD KHAN v. BAQAR & Co. CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, SARGODHA 1976 PLC(CS) 782
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 36D Junior Labor Court has to provide the opportunity to exclude the application by Section 25A parties to submit a document which is not considered i…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN v. MESSRS ZEENAT TEXTILE MILLS, LYALLPUR 1976 PLC(CS) 785
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A and 36D Dismissed for Corruption The Court did not present any evidence in support of such appeal, in the circumstances, was dismissed.…
- Munshi GHULAM HAIDER v. Malik ABDUL GHANI 1976 PLC(CS) 787
Section 17 of the Salary Payment Act 1936 rejected the request for residual wages that the applicant was not the respondent's employee, there is no evidence that the applicant was an employee of the r…
- MUHAMMAD SARDAR v. PREMIER CLOTH MILLS 1976 PLC(CS) 788
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 In jurisdiction for dismissal because of mismanagement, the court cannot take appropriate decision for the inquiry when, on the basis of appropriate inqu…
- CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. FATEH MUHAMMAD 1976 PLC(CS) 790
Evidence of not supporting the accusations of union officials accused of instability and misconduct over the results of domestic inquiries that are not sufficient to bring conviction, in the circumsta…
- SHAFQAT AHMAD CHAUDHRY v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, PAKISTAN ENGINEERING Co. 1976 PLC(CS) 794
Section 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with the Labor Reform Order, 1972, the jurisdiction of the Labor Court, the Managing Director of the Industries under the Economic Reform Ord…
- CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LTD., JARANWALA v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 1976 PLC(CS) 803
The domestic inquiry charge should be substantiated by evidence related to litigation without evidence, keeping the dismissal based on the evidence that the Junior Labor Court Industrial Relations Ord…
- WORKERS UNION v. CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LTD., JARANWAL 1976 PLC(CS) 807
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 (12) (b) Reads with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15, CL (iv) Domestic Inquiry by…
- AMIR KHAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1976 PLC(CS) 808
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with Section 25A & 36D Section 65B and Limitation Opt (IX of 1908), Section 5 Delay Restriction Demand was submitted with application under Section 25A of the …
- MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 1976 PLC(CS) 815
Such testimony on the refusal record for domestic inquiry corruption is not put to the inquiry by the accused inquiry officer; the reasons for non-scrutiny of the complainant by the accused are, once …
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, RAILWAY MAIL SERVICE v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1976 PLC(CS) 818
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A limitation when a departmental appeal is provided under the rules should not be timed in such an appeal, in such cases, not from the date of the origin…
- PECO LTD., LAHORE v. LIAQAT ALI 1976 PLC(CS) 822
Section 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Dismissing of Labor Court Powers Dismissal of domestic inquiry conducted with appropriate defense opportunity…
- CHAIRMAN. WAPDA AND 2 OTHERS v. NAZIR AHMAD 1976 PLC(CS) 823
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (1) Appeals to Labor Court for Disapproval, Conduct, Sentencing of Notice of Complaint to the Sample Employer Due to the Action Involved in the Promotio…
- LYALLPUR COTTON MILLS, LYALLPUR v. ABDUL SATTAR 1976 PLC(CS) 826
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 The risk of a fines being deducted from a worker's wages if challenged under section 25A prior to the receipt of wages by the Labor Court, will result in…
- MUHAMMAD DIN AND 4 OTHERS v. UNITED COTTON MILLS, JAUHARABAD 1976 PLC(CS) 828
In addition to dismissing the union strike notice notice by the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 47, the Collector's bargaining agent states that after the issuance of such notice and durin…
- Haji WALI MU HAMMAD AND 129 OTHERS v. POWER-LOOMS WORKERS\' UNION AND 4 OTHERS 1976 PLC(CS) 834
Violations of the Ordinances 34, 45, 54 and 55 of the Labor Relations Ordinance of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 must be granted within the jurisdiction, no labor dispute exists, in these ci…
- MUHAMMAD NAZIR AZMAT v. MAZHAR HUSSAIN 1976 PLC(CS) 835
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Only in case of infringement of the right guaranteed by law is it permissible to recover from the court the framers under any law cannot create the right…
- MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. GULZAR MUHAMMAD 1976 PLC(CS) 839
West Pakistan Shops and Establishment Ordinance 1969 S 12 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908). O IX, r 13 In the nature of the Code of Conduct, the pre-Civil Code Regulation 1908 sets the condi…
- Syed ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH AND OTHERS v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS AND OTHERS 1976 PLC(CS) 841
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 8 (7) Termination of office-bearers on the basis of a lack of confidence in the formation of union officials, in which case the union officials were not for…
- LUQMAN ALI v. BAQIR & COMPANY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, SARGODHA 1976 PLC(CS) 843
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 8 Trade Union Applicants' Removal Requests for Registration Applicants Removal of voluntary resignation, in these circumstances, when the registrar's permis…
- RAHIMULLAH v. MESSRS SHAKARGANJ SUGAR MILLS LTD., JHANG 1976 PLC(CS) 844
Employee discretion at retirement term Agent does not have right to retire from employee after medical fitness of employment No reason for complaint to refer to retirement Labor Court Industrial Relat…
- MESSRS ASIATIC CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., LYALLPUR v. IKRAMUL HAQ 1976 PLC(CS) 845
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with Section 36D Civil Procedure Code (V3 1903); Went and the record shows that the applicant knew it. The request to take effect, in the circumstances, was de…
- SAIFUDDIN v. GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, RAWALPINDI 1976 PLC(CS) 852
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 15 Disobedience Order related to mismanagement, which must be complied with, must be directed to a sui…
- Mst. SHAMSHAD BHATTI v. ATTOQK INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL, RAWALPINDI 1976 PLC(CS) 862
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (4) and (5) Termination of Service No Complaint Complaint against the teachers of the school operating under the teachers of the Employment Establishmen…
- EMPLOYEES UNION v. THE CHAIRMAN, BROOKE BOND (PAK.) LTD., LAHORE 1976 PLC(CS) 870
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 32 (IA) Enhancing Industrial Disputes is guaranteed by law not to be processed by demand and industrial dispute.…
- EMPLOYEES UNION v. BROOKE BOND (PAK.) LTD., KARACHI 1976 PLC(CS) 873
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 32 (IA) Industrial Dispute Demands Reimbursement for Long-Term Facilities Whether Industrial Disputes Can be Subjected to Workers Losing Possession of Unsta…
- MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN K. G. MEHMOOD v. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE 1976 PLC(CS) 876
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (ix) and 2 (xiv) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 1 (4) with the Board of Intermedia…
- DECO LTD., LAHORE v. ABDUL WAHEED 1976 PLC(CS) 878
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Rejects Labor Court Powers Due to Corruption…
- EMPLOYEES UNION v. MESSERS LAHORE CHEMICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL WORKS LTD., LAHORE 1976 PLC(CS) 880
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Ss 32 (IA) and 43 Industrial Disputes Strike Notice is obligated to comply with its constitution to approve the demands of the executive body before the notice …
- ABDUR RAZZAQUE v. MUHAMMAD SARWAR GOJAR AND 3 OTHERS 1976 PLC(CS) 883
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 53 worker accused of inciting others to strike illegally…
- SHAHBAZ AHMAD v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 1976 PLC(CS) 884
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Study with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 1 (4) National Bank of Pakistan Cr…
- MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MANAGEMENT OF PREMIER CLOTH MILLS, LYALLPUR 1976 PLC(CS) 886
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) [West Pakistan Industrial and Comm…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNION COUNCIL, PIPLAN 1976 PLC(CS) 888
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 53 transferred as sanitary mate payone, transfer of same pay to work in one place does not affect any term and condition of employment No question of unfair…
- MANAGING DIRECTOR, GHULAM HOSIERY No.1 v. REGISTRAR, LABOUR UNIONS 1976 PLC(CS) 889
Articles 22 (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and 34 collective bargaining agent One Labor Union have announced by Registrar as a collecting bargaining agent for two separate establishmen…
- MANAGING DIRECTOR, GHULAM HOSIERY No.1 v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, SARGODHA REGION, 1976 PLC(CS) 889
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 (1) Registrar's collective bargaining agent should not be interfered with by the Labor Court.…
- BASHIR AHMED v. KH ALID SIZING & POWERLOOMS INDUSTRIES, LYALLPUR 1976 PLC(CS) 891
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Resolution possible by court Only termination of service is declared illegal in case of guarantee of guarantee and security breach and neither notice nor…
- AJAB GUL AND ANOTHER v. MAKARWAL & GULLAKHEL EMPLOYEES UNION 1976 PLC(CS) 893
The selection of union court's trade union insider matter cannot interfere with the nomination papers by the scrutiny committee appointed by the executive body of the union petition under section 8 (7…
- IQBAL EMBROIDERY MILLS v. ASHIQ ALI 1976 PLC(CS) 894
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Termination of Service Challenged as an Illegal Employer The Applicant Was Not His Employee Record indicates that no employee had been issued identificat…
- Kh. RASHID AHMAD v. NAZIR AND ANOTHER 1976 PLC(CS) 896
The Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 17 Authority is acting quickly and in taking evidence, the employer was not given the appropriate opportunity of the Defense Order of Authority in the circumstances…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN AND 14 OTHERS v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, P. W. R., LAHORE 1976 PLC(CS) 908
The pay scale of National Pay Scale under Notification No 1 (2) NG Amp / 71, dated 8 3 1972 should have the benefit of salary deployment employees, instead of the specific category as defined in NPS N…
- MIARI TEXTILE MILLS AND INDUSTRIES WORKERS UNION v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, LYALLPUR 1976 PLC(CS) 919
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969S, 11 and 19 (iii) Cancellation of Registration of Union Establishment temporarily closed with permission of the court, the employer also terminated the services of …
- EMPLOYEES UNION v. GRINDLAYS BANK LTD., RAWALPINDI 1976 PLC(CS) 922
R 5 Number of Officers Rolls Directory and Manager Not Demand Notice After the number of office bearers has increased to 10 but thereafter it has been reduced to an additional number of union official…
Other years — Labour Court Punjab
1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1982 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.