Karachi High Court Sindh — Judgments of 1968
226 reported judgments of the Karachi High Court Sindh from 1968 — page 3 of 3.
- ABDUL GHAFOOR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1536
Pakistan Penal Code Section 162 Complaint Unlawful To Impact Government Employees…
- KHAN MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1542
Rapid evidence of abduction by Pakistan Penal Code section 6 366 and Ab on6 shows that the affected girls leave their father's home freely over the age of 16, in which case the consent of the sexually…
- MUHARRAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1550
Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 164 The accused was actually arrested on 28 January 1966, but, for unknown reasons, his arrest was not shown in the investigation papers until 30 Apr…
- MUHAMMAD AZRAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1567
Pakistan Penal Code Section 300, Exception 1 The grave and sudden outrage led to a series of abuses between the accused and the victim and the accused, who pulled out a knife from his nephew of Shalwa…
- ALLAHDAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1585
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 304 and 323 The evidence of the prosecution witnesses is false and suspicious The accused has been acquitted…
- THE STATE v. JUMAN 1968 PCRLJ 1608
Appeal against sections 417 and 423 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) against the offender if found guilty under section 302, PPC, but acquitted by the trial court, not supporting eyewitnesses In…
- JAN MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1625
Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 337 The full sanction of the offense is not clear in Section 337 (!) But the prosecution fails to legally convert its accomplice to the recipient, ho…
- GHOUS BUX v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1653
The prosecution's witnesses for the murder of Section 302 disbelieved and the suspects related to the recovery of criminal weapons were described under Section 342…
- SHER ALAM v. COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD DIVISION HYDERABAD 1968 PCRLJ 1663
Section 8 (2), 19 and 24 of the West Pakistan Control of Gondas Ordinance 1959 read with the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 Tribunal passed unauthorized order under section 8 (2), illegal…
- SHAMSUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1675
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 526: The complainant seeking transfer of a case against the accused in Karachi is seeking to move the case to the original direction of the High Court. Will be …
- ABDUL KABIR v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL POLICE, KHAIRPUR 1968 PCRLJ 1677
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 detention of corpses, valid custody and legal detention has been granted with jurisdiction. Were done…
- THE STATE v. BASHIR 1968 PCRLJ 1682
Appeal against the accused on appeal if found guilty under Section 2, PPC, Section 417 App, but the details of the case contradicting the case based on the trial case were disputed. Names of witnesses…
- TAJ MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1698
Pakistan failed to establish charges against sections 409 and 468 of the Penal Code…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. Mst. MEHER-UN-NISSA 1968 PCRLJ 1701
Section 9439 and Muslim Family Laws read with Ordinance (61 of 1961 of VIII); Sections 7 and 9 apply for care by the wife against the husband It is a request that he divorces his wife legally. Or othe…
- THE STATE v. KARAM ALI 1968 PCRLJ 1707
Section 403 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) was read with the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (XL of 1958), offense under section 6 (5) section 161, PPC pursuant to section 5 (2). Read together, the…
- ALI HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1734
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 421 has been accused of fraudulently buying cloth from the complainant and promising to pay the price the next day, but has failed to do so. The circumstances of the ca…
- GHULAM QAUDAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1760
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) is prosecuting the accused in the trial of a 56-murder-1 trial that showed he introduced facts so that the evidence on the record could be falsified. Which can resu…
- ABDUL RASHID v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1765
Exception 4 reads with section 302, section 300 suddenly disputes between the accused and the deceased, however, the victim was brutally taken advantage of for six sudden injuries, exception 4 to sect…
- IBRAHIM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1784
Under section 24 of the Evidence Act 1872, it was conceded that a disturbance was made in accordance with the provisions of section 24.…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA-Convict v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1797
The trial court is not examining the accused under section 4040 & 2 342 and the trial court does not provide the opportunity to engage with a lawyer of his choice, which was declared illegal. Is.…
- CHATTO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1814
Pakistan Penal Code Section 304 Confession Offense Nut The voluntary and factual findings of such confession did not fully prove the offense and the conviction was kept separate.…
- THE STATE v. MIRZA 1968 PCRLJ 1823
The conviction under the Pakistan Penal Code section 379 theft is the correctness of any sentence under the trial court to the maximum Magistrate, on the basis that the accused (a) was a youth (b) no …
- SHAHNAWAZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1831
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 307 eyewitnesses clearly stated that they did not actually see the accused firing at them, no gun was recovered, or for example the culprit of the accused, who was puni…
- THE STATE v. AHMAD BUX 1968 PCRLJ 1865
The prosecution of West Pakistan's Prevention of Gambling Ordinance, 61 1961 under Section 8 438 and 9439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC), denied the allegation that the raid was private. The ho…
- MUHAMMAD BUKSH v. HAJI MUHAMMAD 1968 PCRLJ 1882
Application under sections 439 and 561 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) 43 439 and 1 561 prohibits unlawful and defective acts of entertaining such requests, except on illegal orders. Cannot b…
- ARSALA KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1910
Applicants 12 (2) (ix), (x), (xiii) and 16 of the Karachi Control of Disorderly Persons Act 1952 declared a dangerous person and a tribunal accused of having a history sheet Ordered to stay abroad. On…
Other years — Karachi High Court Sindh
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.