Karachi High Court Sindh — Judgments of 1968
226 reported judgments of the Karachi High Court Sindh from 1968 — page 2 of 3.
- HOSHANG v. DR. EDDIE P.BHARUCHA 1968 PLD 723
Regarding the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 16 Distribution Agreement, the specific performance of a particular contract portion, where the contract consists of multiple parts, is separate and indep…
- HOSHANG v. DR. EDDIE P. BHARUCHA 1968 PLD 752
Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Section 83 In the courts of Pakistan, resident in a foreign country, arranging a trial on a foreign enemy hibition is no exception to prosecuting such alien enemy as the pla…
- MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN v. MST. NAYAB BEGUM 1968 PLD 758
Courts of Reconciliation Ordinance, 1961 Section 5 (1), (4) (B) Failure of a party to nominate its representative's chairman under section 5 (4) (B); An order passed by such court against the legal re…
- MESSRS ASSOCIATED MINING CORPORATION v. SQUADRON LEADER. G. R SIPRA AND OTHERS 1968 PLD 771
Temporary injunction of civil procedure code Order XXXIX and interlocutory orders O XXXIX, rr, 1 do 2 Balance of provisional injunction to act on the original charge by the original borrower to proces…
- FAHIMUDDIN KHOKHAR v. MST. ZAIBUNNISA 1968 PLD 774
Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Sections 4 (2), (S), 9 (I) and 25 expressions \ guardianship \, custody \ and \ ordinary residence sy no equivalent terms \ guardian \ as described in section 4 (2). Prote…
- SYED ABDUL WAHEED v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 776
The handwriting expert read with the Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 233 and 239 and the Evidence Act (I of 1872), sections 43 and 47 and 60, in the general case, in the two cases, the actua…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. MESSRS SURRIDGE & BEECHENO 1968 PLD 778
Section 19 of the Income Tax Act, 1922, an analysis…
- MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 782
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 4 514 (i) Forfeiture of a Guaranteed Bail Before attempting to make any attempt to secure a bail, the court shall order the confiscation of the bond before the …
- SIKANDAR AZAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 786
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 288 The statements made by the witnesses in the High Court are brought to the record of the trial court; To what extent they can be trusted and accepted in the c…
- GODHO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 791
Under the Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 540A accused (No. 8), Section 302/149, the PC Magistrate has been accused of being exempt from the presence of his client and then in court. Record the statement…
- AMIN COTTON COMPANY v. KARACHI COTTON ASSOCIATION LTD. 1968 PLD 797
Ordinance of Trade Organizations 1961 Section 12 jurisdiction not to be barred from pending arbitration tribunals Constitution jurisdiction should be strictly construed by law and those set out by law…
- LIMED KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 803
Section 161 of the Pakistan Penal Code was read with the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), convicted offenders of Section 5 (2) and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment almost 3 years before tha…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. MESSRS MUHAMMAD ASGHAR MUHAMMAD YUNUS & CO. 1968 PLD 805
An application for registration of contributions of sections 21 (4) and 26 cannot be made under section 23 (4), but sections 23 (4) and 26 of the Income Tax Officer under section 23 judgment To examin…
- HADI BUX v. HADI BUX 1968 PCRLJ 807
Sections 2 302 and 7 307, Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) under PPC registered a case against Section 3 423 and the Sessions Judge recorded the offense under Section 4 304A and Section 2 302 and The…
- ZIAUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 810
Pakistan Penal Code Section 489D convicted of conspiracy to impersonate accused, sentenced to 7 years in prison…
- WEST PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LTD 1968 PLD 812
Confirmation of Oral Evidence in Proof of Contract Translating Documents (18) Section 92, Provo (2) Documents For the application of clause (2), the formal degree of the document must be related to th…
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 820
The restitution of the settlement agreement, read with Section 5 345 (AA) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), 439, shows that in the interests of future relationships, the complainant is now pro…
- BDUL RASHID MIR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 830
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, section 12 (1) 23, to show that the failure to forward the sale of goods in Pakistan under section 12__ percent / period, does not equate to a crime. The acc…
- ASHIQ ALI v. AMIRALI LADIWALA 1968 PCRLJ 835
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) S \ s 435, 439 & 561 charged with revision to increase sentence, section 302/34, prosecuted under PPC but guilty under S \ 302/109 In the final analysis, the trial cour…
- AMIRALI LADIWALA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 837
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 30 Con The offender of the accused can interfere with the judicial jurisdiction under the facts based on the facts obtained by the courts if the evidence on rec…
- MUSA v. MESSERS HUSSAINBHOY KARIMJI & SONS 1968 PCRLJ 839
Evidence Act 1872 Section 33 Investigating the Evidence of Witness In the previous case, there is no evidence on record that such evidence could not be traced; can go.…
- MUNSHI KHAN v. SUBHANALI AND ANOTHER 1968 PLD 844
The Code of Civil Code 1908 can be issued for withdrawal for claims over 96 claims where such relief comes directly from the court's view and the technical grounds to avoid litigation were not accepte…
- MESSRS BAWANY VIOLIN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. MESSRS KARACHI GAS CO. LTD. 1968 PLD 846
Civil Procedure Code Orders XXXV, rr 1 and 2 of the CPC Interplanet A XXXV are allowed to consider the formal request for a restraining court order during the integration of the request, while in the …
- ABDUL QADIR v. COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR DIVISION AND OTHERS 1968 PLD 853
Section 109 of the Pakistan Penal Code was read with the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963), proving a Section 3 hat-trespass offense not merely to abolish the principal offense …
- JOHN JOHNSTON v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 856
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC), read with Section 1956 and the Criminal Procedure (XL V of 1860), Section 193, must be necessary for the prosecution's approval of the section 193 for false prose…
- MESSERS REYAZ-O-KHALID COMPANY, KAKACHI- v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SOUTH ZONE, KARACHI 1968 PLD 858
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 66 (2) Section 23 (4) read with Income Flat Rate Question of Income Tax on flat rate determining what such value could be was not questioned. The quantity or rate quotient …
- HABIBULLAH v. BAWA VASDEVGIR CHELO SHAMBHUGIR 1968 PLD 869
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (b) prescribes the existence of a landlord and tenant relationship between the controlling jurisdictional parties before assuming jurisdiction a…
- THE STATE v. DR. ABDUL FATEH 1968 PCRLJ 874
Section 161 of the Pakistan Penal Code read the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947). Section 5 (2) and the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (XL of 1958), Section 6 (5), the prosecution was …
- MUHAMMAD UMER AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1968 PLD 875
Evidence Act 1872 Sections 45 and 73 Expert Evidence Handwriting Specialists require very careful examination, upon the careful inspection of disputed and recognized writings, especially with the help…
- SETH HAFIZ ABDUL AZIZ YOUSFANI & SONS v. HAJI ALI MUHAMN1AD & CO. (REG.) 1968 PLD 883
Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 149 and O XXVII of the Code, extension of time for payment of judicial fee of 15 jurisdictional application, before the removal of the pauper application, the discretion …
- ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL OF WEST PAKISTAN v. HAMTHO 1968 PCRLJ 886
The words and offenses of Land Customs Act 1924 Section 9 mean police officers are authorized under the Customs Act 1924 to investigate and send the accused to sea, under trial for those arrested at s…
- GHULAM QADIR v. THE STATE AND ANOTHER 1968 PLD 894
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 56 200 Section 200, CRPC An abuse of the grievance process in court, half a month after an incident (murder), the applicant is convicted First time to introduce…
- AMIN KHAN v. UNIVERSITY OF SIND 1968 PLD 899
Civil procedure Code Order V and Summon OV service for CPC matters, r 15 summons Family members usually meet with parents and their children on Deen fan donations with the defendant's adult brother ba…
- MIR KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PLD 903
Section 302 Proof of Murder Medical Report Post-mortem Treatment Opinion of Identifying the Injury of the Doctor 20 In the presence of witnesses on such a case it is very difficult to expect to be kep…
- MUHAMMAD BANARAS v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 906
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 777 The waiver agreement must be made only if the prosecution's case is accepted without a waiver and the prosecution's case against its sanction will be unsucc…
- KARACHI FLOUR MILLS UNION AND OTHERS v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS 1968 PLD 910
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary injections and interlocutory orders o XXXX, Not held, illegal or illegal…
- MESSERS BALGAMWALLA COTTON GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY v. MESSRS ELITE TEXTILE MILLS AND PRESSING FACTORY LTD. 1968 PLD 916
The notice contemplated by section 9 (b) of section 9 (b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, in which a right or power may be sent to a party to appoint or substitute an arbitrator and not to a party who h…
- GHULAM RASOOL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 927
Pakistan Penal Code Section 326 Determines Determination and Determination of Injuries (Due to Acidic Burning) Increased Injury of Serious Injury By which the Complainant and his Party have been Attac…
- THE STATE v. MAIIER-UL-QADRI 1968 PCRLJ 945
The contempt of court Act 1926 section 2 offensive writing was printed and published and about one month before the matter could be taken to the Court Editor, Printer and Publisher, a contempt of cour…
- KAZI AMJAD HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1005
In Pakistan Panel Code S, 420, read with the Prevention of Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) provides no evidence to prove that the accused had any financial benefit. Horn has been charged, i…
- MUSLIM ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1037
Criminal Procedure for Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 439 Prison 1964…
- THE STATE v. MOHSINULLAH 1968 PCRLJ 1043
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) section terminates the defendant's complaint against him9 from refusing to mention the background of the dispute between him and the accused and refraining from ref…
- STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. ISMAIL USMAN 1968 PCRLJ 1053
In Articles 22 and 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947, it was announced that it was exporting a consignment of fish food to Singapore, and was raising the risk of sending it back to the co…
- ATTA MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1058
Section 302 reads with Section 100 private defense, the defendants have the right to be among the hostile people belonging to the dangerous tribe who have begun the use of addicts. From then on they w…
- SALEH MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1069
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) S: 1 561 read with Sections 6 426, and 7497 (), repealing the guarantees of Section 1A1A, holding that the clash has become an option. Order the candy order to bail out…
- GULZAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1081
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) section 561 was pending for 6 years and not examined by a single witness prosecution, which has a distance of 350 miles between the defendant's permanent residence …
- ZIAUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1084
Under Section 177 Section 420, a crime inquiry or trial complaint, the PPC complainant has been accused of contacting the accused in Karachi and demanding a refund, that he falsely represents the comp…
- THE STATE v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 1968 PCRLJ 1092
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 530 (PP) and Schedule 11, Section 211 and Section 211 under PPC, trial under Section 215, PPC under PPC to prove a crime And is condemning it. (Transportation c…
- SATABOSHAH v. INAMI 1968 PCRLJ 1094
No allegation of transfer of Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 526 has not been issued to the accused yet nor a preliminary inquiry has been concluded, such an unfair trial would be appreciated, hence the …
- MUHAMMAD AMIN v. TAH STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1098
Due to the Deputy Commissioner's anticipated visit, the violation of 406's trust in Pakistan Penal Code Section 403 with the intention of using such alterations in the school premises for later use an…
- HaJ1 BASHIR v. JUMO 1968 PCRLJ 1100
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 526 Case filed for remote district harassment of resident district complaint on transfer of suit, suitable for prosecution of accused…
- ABDUL AZIZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1101
And the C Customs Act (VIII of 1878), section 167 (8l) of the smuggling of gold from abroad (punishable by only 6 years RI) by the public on the position of the government for such a crime that is dis…
- Sled WAHID BUX SHAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1105
Under section 202, the purpose of the preliminary investigation and the intention is to summon the accused through notice, allow him to examine the prosecution's testimony and present his own case, wh…
- ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL OF WEST PAKISTAN AND EX-OFFICIO PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, KARACHI v. HAMTHO 1968 PCRLJ 1116
It cannot be understood that the Land Customs Act, 1924 Sections 7 (2) and 9 and C Customs Act (VIII of 1878), Section 167 (81), have the power to send police officers arrested for investigation, crim…
- ILLAH1 BUX v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1123
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 2 302 compulsory obligation read with Section 34 cannot be reduced unless the indications and circumstances justify such advertisement that the accused in the murder of…
- MAHMOOD AHMAD ABBASI v. THE GOVERNOR OF WEST PAKISTAN 1968 PCRLJ 1139
Press and Publication Ordinance 1960 Section 23 Every citizen has the right to freely express controversial religious and historical questions. Such a right, however, should not exceed criticism, nor …
- HARCHUMAL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1167
Complaint against PPC filed against applicant as a result of lengthy litigation between the complainant and the applicant under Section 20 5620, Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) under PPC. That illegal…
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN BUGTI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1177
Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 342 The examination of the accused does not constitute a piece of important evidence; under section 342 such evidence cannot be used against the accused to provide the acc…
- MUHAMMAD USMAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1182
Proof Art (I of 1872), section 45, read in Pakistan Panel Code Sections 420, 468 and 471, Complaint with Tapped Expert Fraud Fraudulent, who fraudulently obtained Taker loan A fake application in the …
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. FATEH MUHAMMAD 1968 PCRLJ 1189
In accordance with Article 195 read under Section 476, prosecution should be initiated against Section 476 for contempt of public servants and for offenses against public justice. In the interest of j…
- BANNFY KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1192
Evidence kept in examination for 3 years fixing medical witness at the age of 17 in Pakistan Penal Code Sections 361 and 363 abduction cases, in circumstances, not conclusive…
- ABDUL SAMAD KAZMI v. ABDUL RAZAK 1968 PCRLJ 1195
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section High High9 The High Court review powers should be rarely used, and from time to time the principles specifically emphasized that a trial of justice is a serious…
- ABDUL GHAFFAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1202
Section 5 (1) (c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, whether the person to whom the payment is made is the person who complies with the provisions of section S (1) (c) and is subject to the…
- RAFIQUE v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1208
In section 302 and the Animal Husbandry Act (I of 1871), section 24 was charged with examining evidence to release livestock from ex-cattle by engaging in livestock, harming and feeding crops. The com…
- ABDUL SATTAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1213
Crimes under Excise Cases Crimes under Excise Laws result in reduced excise revenue, affect health and ethics of the nation and also increase crime; Will )…
- DILAWAR KHAN v. Syed MOHSIN IMAM 1968 PCRLJ 1216
In Article 192 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC), the transfer of 528 cases is approved by the magistrate without giving notice to the parties concerned and for any reason it is illegal, and there…
- GULAB KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1220
Sections 107, 112 and 117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) do not have to be strict and strict to maintain peace, even though it cannot be illegal or can be considered by law to be considered …
- ABDUL NAZIR GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1224
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) under Section 6 Code8, PPC, Section 6 516 Code of Conduct and Settlement of the case is pending pending in which several shops have been locked and the police have to s…
- THE STATE v. MUHAMMAD MALOOK 1968 PCRLJ 1232
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (5) Reverses the bail of the accused, a young man aged 16 or 17, with serious prosecution, cutting serious limbs of an alleged complainant. Due to which the…
- Mst. GULZAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1238
For the trial by a magistrate in the Tribal Area Sessions Judge, the Criminal Procedure Code of Women (CCP), residing in Karachi, required 498 crores 500 bail under warranty warrant arrest, but the wo…
- THE STATE v. SAIFAL 1968 PCRLJ 1239
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) read with Section 562 Probation of Offenders Ordinance (XLV of 1960), Probation convicted of a crime under Section 411, PPC Trial Magistrate. On release, the release of…
- M. A. OSMAN JAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1248
Section 6 406 and Section 253 of the Complaint Complaint under 202020, the PPC magistrate, after examining the evidence that this dispute is facing, was of a serious nature and the accused ADM was req…
- HIDSHANG N. E. DINSHAW v. AHMED ALI MUHAMMAD KARAM ALI 1968 PCRLJ 1285
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561 A Complaint alleging that the accused partner with the firm's doctrine of baseless fraud and fraudulent theory with the proceeds of illegal sale. The relate…
- AI-Haj MAHMOOD MIRZA v. HASEEBUN NISA BEGUM 1968 PCRLJ 1296
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 526 Transfer of Trial The Effect of a Trial Magistrate on the Parties Before It…
- THE STATE v. RAJAB 1968 PCRLJ 1308
Section 417 Appeals Against Evil Section 417 does not lie on the question of fact, the appeal of the trial court against the trial court's views on the appellate court's slow behavior in the credibili…
- ALAUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1313
The provisions of Sections 6 and 8 of the Karachi Control of Disorderly Act, 1952, read with sections 21 and 22, against which the release of a person's bail during the proceedings of the proceedings …
- ZAHEER ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1346
Article 197 reads with permission of the Public Employee in the Office of the Chief Election against Pakistan's Pay (1962), Articles 178 Art 147 and 154 Civil Services (Classification, Controlling San…
- ABDUL AZIZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1349
The Pakistan Penal Code section 34 should not be an indication of the joint intention of the joint intention unless necessary conditions are deducted.…
- SAEEDUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1353
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, has no independent evidence to substantiate the testimony of the prosecution so that the prosecution's case can be reasoned beyond reasonable d…
- THE STATE v. JAGAN 1968 PCRLJ 1359
Section 3 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1963 and the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Rules, 1963, r 4R Directory Requirements and Not Required. Availability He cannot make …
- THE STATE v. UMEDALI 1968 PCRLJ 1368
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 417 Appeals against eviction cases must be considered in the appeal…
- Capt. MUHAMMAD AZHAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1374
Sections 5 and 6 of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958, read with the accused that no official position was held under the allegations; do not have.…
- Haji BASHIR v. Haji PATHANA 1968 PCRLJ 1395
Section 1 566, an abuse of court proceeding under the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) under the PPC Story, was presented as the story of a suspected character bogus, made by an angry man, And the tria…
- ABDULLAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1416
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 439 of the High Court revision powers and his lawyer signed a statement before the appellate court, stating that he would not suppress the merits appeal, but o…
- KARIM BUX v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1427
The witnesses read in Sections 302, 323 and 321, along with the witnesses of Sections 142 and 149, assemble in the lower courts that 15 of the accused participated in the fight and can identify only 3…
- M. SADIQ KHAN v. M. MOINUDDIN 1968 PCRLJ 1432
Section 8 408, Criminal Code of Conduct (PCC) under PPC seeks 6e to complain to the courts to prevent criminal liability complaints, conduct, criminal misconduct from prosecuting. Is trying to use…
- MUHAMMAD YAKUB RATHORE v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1438
Pakistan Panel Code Section 304A Rash and Negligence Action should prove by direct evidence that the accused was speedy and negligent. There is no evidence to prove that under Section 304A, the defend…
- HAJI MISRI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1463
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (5) read with Section 17 (4) Session Judge Request to cancel bail with Sessions Judge Request to engage himself in Sessions Judge, Transfer Request to Addit…
- AKHTAR ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1466
Under section 498 read under section 496 and 497 with the High Court of Bell Pox Air, Criminal Code (CCPC) not tripled under Sections 496 and 497 under Sections 496 and 497, PPC Section Must be satisf…
- MUHAMMAD ALI BAQAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1478
Bombay Children Act 1924 Section 27 (1) (b) The juvenile delinquent, the accused, a person under 16 years old, is a ninth grade student and not a former offender; Has been sentenced. Caring for his gu…
- RAFIQUE v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1479
Proof of linking the accused to the Pakistan Penal Code Section 201 confession offense should only be accepted unless there is evidence of contradiction from some of the cont or is totally unacceptabl…
- ASGHAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1482
Bombay Children's Act 1924 under section 27 (1) (d), (f) in sub-clauses (d) and (f), both separately or separately disqualified under the provisions of subsection…
- ABDUL SAMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1487
Section 3 (7A), 6 (2) and 6A (2) of the Security of Pakistan Act 1952 were read with the Preventive Detention Law Amendment Act (1Y of 1952), provided by the Section 5 Security of Pakistan Act of Admi…
- MUHAMMAD YAKUB v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1492
The Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) is based on the highly inaccurate view of the law against the weight of the evidence of the prosecution and the facts admitted against the order of section 439.…
- KAMAL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1500
The Pakistan Penal Code was read with Sections 304, Part 2, 313 and 325 Sections 34 and 149, in which a fight between two parties resulted in the death of one and injured several persons. The trial co…
- THE STATE v. Kazi ABDUL HAFEEZ KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1503
Under Section 476, the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) requires the exercise of discretion under Section 476. The allegations and consequently he had no material, but to conclude that the trial court'…
- MIR KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1513
Pakistan Penal Code Section 309 questions which are not put before the reviewers on every allegation against the accused. Non-compliance with Section 309 results in the defendants being prejudiced, wh…
- GHULAM HAIDER v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1517
Conduct of trial under section 439 of the trial of the trial version in relation to the prosecution version when the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) eyes testify. review. , Will not provide a sound ba…
- JAN MUHAMMAD SHAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1521
Pakistan Penal Code Section 8 36 woman is an independent, referenced in the first information report, despite having the opportunity to do so, based on the evidence of witnesses close to the prosecuti…
- ALLAHYAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1526
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 202 The purpose and intention of the preliminary inquiry is to determine whether the proceedings should be conducted unjustly, and the accused should be allowed …
Other years — Karachi High Court Sindh
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.