Bombay High Court India — Judgments of 1966
10 reported judgments of the Bombay High Court India from 1966.
- ABHAY L. KHATAU v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, BOMBAY 1966 PTD 58
Joint trustees, whether the Association of Individuals Wealth Tax Act 1957, Sections 3 and 21 (4), have the obligation to pay individual tax as an individual, meaning…
- G. S. PODDAR v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, BOMBAY CITY II 1966 PTD 109
Exemption Articles intended for personal or domestic use of diagnostic golden articles made in the form of household utensils, whether articles are placed in the show case section 5 (1) (viii) of the …
- MANSUKHLAL & BROS. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY II 1966 PTD 135
Covering income Maximum penalty means the return of an income tax, which means the quantum of concealment, the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, section 28 (1) (c).…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY I v. CHIMANLAL J. DALAL & Co. 1966 PTD 149
Losses in loss of registered speculation may be carried forward against profits in the next year's Income Tax Act, 1922, Sections 23 (5), (6) and 24 (1).…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY 1 v. CIBA PHARMA (PRIVATE) LTD. 1966 PTD 209
Business Expenses Scientific Research Expenses Paid to Another Company for Acquiring a Technical and Research Contribution Whether the Expenses of Scientific Research or the Expenses of Business Expen…
- S. F. ENGINEER (A FIRM) v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY I 1966 PTD 233
? Expenses to increase loans for business finance…
- VISHWANATH GOPAL OIL MILL v. S. C. PRASHAR, 1966 PTD 643
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 64 (3), the second and third prejudice letter challenging the jurisdiction of the officer appointed before the time but reaching the officer beyond time as the time limit f…
- ARVIND N. MAFATLAL v. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, NORTH SATARA 1966 PTD 648
Income Tax Act 1922 Sections 16 (2), 18 (5) and 35 Taxation Rules (Merged States and Amendment Extensions) Act (of 1949), Section J7 Fulton State Income Tax Act (111 of 1941) Scope) The record obvious…
- PRADESH AND BHANDARA, NAGPUR v. M. G. CHITNAVIS 1966 PTD 814
Section 9 (1) (iv), (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the third provision provides for the annual late value conservation tax and the tax charged in lieu of tax and direct services, and not only Regard…
- LAJWANTI SIAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADHYA 1966 PTD 820
Section 2 (4A), 12B and 33 of Capital Income Tax Act, 1922, decides the appeal on the basis of whether a capital asset transfer, sale or exchange appellate tribunal should be transferred to a coal min…
Other years — Bombay High Court India
2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1991 · 1986 · 1984 · 1981 · 1980 · 1972 · 1971 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1960
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.