Board of Revenue Punjab — Judgments of 2009
10 reported judgments of the Board of Revenue Punjab from 2009.
- MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. Jam ABDUL MALIK 2009 YLR 666
Sections 42 & 4 164 Variation Cancellation Applicants believed that they were owners because of variable land that did not have a responding party. On the basis of the changes which have been submitte…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER 2009 MLD 789
Section 164 Rev Review Applicants are accused of violating the Moga and drinking more water than they deserve, and the Divisional Canal Officer made special charges against these applicants without in…
- Mian ALI NAWAZ v. KIIALID HUSSAIN 2009 MLD 797
Subject to section 23 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), provisions 39 and 164 acquisition of nature and the distribution of shamlat land, the property belonging to the respondents on the …
- ALTAF KHAN v. NISAR AHMAD 2009 MLD 804
Section 8 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 163 Section 8 (1) of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act 1957, authorization of member review, the Board of Revenue Scope Review may…
- JEHANGIR v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2009 MLD 814
Section 7 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), under section 42 and 164 allotment of the Ahta under the Kutchi Population Scheme, was passed in favor of the respondent in respect of t…
- MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2009 MLD 827
Sections 42 & of 164 allowed the foreclosure of the land in the interest of the applicants of the land of 11 m of the San7 as well as the interest in the applicants was part of the advance which was p…
- DILDAR KHAN v. ISHTIAQ AHMAD 2009 MLD 840
Sections 36 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R 17 The appointment of the respondents, who was the son of the deceased lumber, was designated a limbar on the basis that he was the…
- ABDUL MAJID v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN 2009 MLD 847
While canceling Articles 42, 44 and 164, the High Court accepted the amendment against the order of the Appellate Court, and the petitioners challenged the High Court order in the appeal, which was di…
- MEHR KHAN v. State 2009 MLD 855
R 17 The appointment of the lambarder petitioner was made by the District Officer (Revenue) and after considering the qualities and behavior of the candidates, the applicant already received the land …
- AMJAD FAROOQ v. SYED ALI 2009 MLD 862
The review of the interchange request for Sections 44 and 164 Division Officer (Revenue) canceled the order of its predecessor, allowing it to conduct a mutation review. Applicants filed an appeal bef…
Other years — Board of Revenue Punjab
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.