Allahabad High Court India — Judgments of 1964
9 reported judgments of the Allahabad High Court India from 1964.
- DEOKINANDAN SHOOSHANKARLAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. & v. P. 1964 PTD 93
The Reference High Court directed the Tribunal not to answer the question and then raised the code of conduct. Unanswered Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, Sections 66 (1) and (3)…
- DEVI PRASAD VISHWANATH PRASAD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, 1964 PTD 139
Non-real estate account books were rejected and the income of the business is estimated under section 13, irrespective of the expected income in real credit entry, whether the legal Indian Income Tax …
- A. H. WHEELER & Co. PRIVATE LTD. v. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ALLAHABAD 1964 PTD 293
Evaluation Correction Under the Finance Act of 1958, emissions to reduce super tax exemptions 59…
- TIKA RAM & SONS (PRIVATE) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. AND ANOTHER 1964 PTD 342
End of the Company Whether the pending assessment proceedings can be continued Legal proceedings, the proof of the debt is the obligation to pay income tax before the Assessment Loans Companies Act, 1…
- Sint. SARASWATI DEVI LOHIA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. 1964 PTD 385
Reassessment receipts are entered into the capital account The Income Tax Officer is disclosed to consider whether they are capital or escaping from the receipt of income, followed by section 34 of th…
- INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANDA CIRCLE, KANPUR v. MUNSIF, HAMIRPUR AND OTHERS 1964 PTD 622
Income Tax Procedure Documents filed before the Income Tax Officer's secret form balance sheet or document filed with the Income Tax Officer Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, Section 54 Code of Criminal Pr…
- R. B. CHAMPALAL RAMSARUP v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. 1964 PTD 661
Bad debt…
- BENARSI SILK PALACE v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. 1964 PTD 670
Re-evaluation limits voluntary returns should be filed within four years This process should be followed after four years filed 34 Legacy Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, Section 22 (3), 34 (1) (a), 34 1)…
- KHANJAN LAL SEWAK RAM v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. 1964 PTD 824
Failure to distribute profits for renewal of firm registration is not liable to the account box officer for refusal of renewal of registration even if the appellant made an appeal under section 33 (4)…
Other years — Allahabad High Court India
2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1981 · 1980 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1960
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.