ABDUL AZIZ versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 447, 97, 100 and 106 of the trial court acted outside their jurisdiction in collecting evidence against the accused, summoning the prosecution witnesses at the request of the prosecution which was not submitted by the prosecution. And neither did he. In the case of the prosecution, the accused, who was tried to find fault, had no knowledge of the alleged settlement of the land due to the dispute and the trial court did not believe the prosecution's witnesses on the same day. Of the 11 suspects who were acquitted of ocular evidence, who were subject to internal contradictions, they were not fraudulent and malicious, and did not endorse them through independent evidence, even from medical evidence and recovery evidence. Conflicts between the parties were not recognized. His case failed to prove beyond doubt and the accused was declared entitled to his own defense of the purse and in this case the property accused was acquitted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Shangla lawyer