MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
Section 2302/444/4 Code4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the trial court that tried to deal with the extension of section 438 criminal reference failed to conclude the trial within the time frame set by the High Court and the said period. After the expiry of the term, it was called for an extension. Initially observing that the High Court affirmed such an exercise, that the reference to the extension of the stipulated period should have been made by the trial court before the expiry date and second, by the High Court. The order passed should not have been taken by the trial court. As usual, keeping in mind the judicial rankings in this regard should not be repeated in such a slow and repetitive manner in the future. Instructions and instructions for giving the High Court orders and session trials to give proper weight to their settlement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer
