Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus A. D. C. (G)

Civil Procedure Code Order XXI, XXI, Rr 89 & 94 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for the issuance of CPC orders and orders, who filed an objection to the sale of immovable property in the execution of the Money Order Objections dismissed on the objections of the judges, the statement of the counsel of the protestors that he has no directive that the objection to the sale was dismissed, the auction of the property ordered to appeal the judgment of the debtor, such an order Was accepted and the merit was remanded to decide the case, the decision was not made. Served in the post-remand proceedings by the Exiting Court and the request for objection was again rejected by the same lawyer's statement (who had earlier told the court that he had no direction) that he would not suppress the objection request. Will be, thus clearly unauthorized, illegal and void, therefore, all proceedings after execution, including the sale confirmation and the expediting of the sales certificate, were expressly invalidated. Had to be neglected as non-existent in the eyes of the law. O XXI, R 94, CP could not be issued under a legitimate title. The auction was not given to buyers, then transfer of any interest: it would not have any legitimate and legitimate award in the property. Also, the decision of the property owner was obliged, when non-Muslims left the country in 1947. , And the property was vacant by nature, and as such, the property was kept in custody for such property. immigration advocates phone number from Machh lawyer