Find a Lawyer

SAIRA versus HAMIDUL HAQ

The Mohammedan Lawyer Plaintiff (daughter) was seeking Shari'ah's 7/104 share in cash deposited in various banks by her father (deceased) during her late life when she was allegedly on the death bed. Had withdrawn some money. One of the defendants, in the name of the deceased plaintiff, illegally and fraudulently claimed his share of the money, the trial court claimed on behalf of the plaintiff in respect of the money At the time of his death, the claim was overruled, but his claim was overruled by the deceased's father during one of his late life sentences, an appeal was filed against the claim which was rejected. had gone. The plaintiff had filed an appeal against the execution order under which the order was to be executed against him, the plaintiff could not claim his share in them. Payments or funds expire during the life of the deceased, because his case was for his part in the inheritance ie the perty left by the deceased supporter dead; after the death of the plaintiff the deceased's assets in his 7/104 The shareholder was entitled only to the plaintiff not presenting any evidence that the deceased was not in a position to understand what he was doing or was pressured by the defendant to sign a specific check. ? Thus, the plaintiff's right to refuse to order the sum already drawn by his father before his death was denied, even though it was against all the defendants but thereafter It can also be implemented against any one of the decision makers. On this question, the execution was made of his deceased father jobs for fresh advocates from Khanbel lawyer