GHULAM HUSSAIN versus STATE
Articles 302, 324, 323 and 148 of the testimonial benefit benefit, witnesses not only related to each other and to the victim but also to the accused were tried to remove the evidence after seeing the medical evidence and arguments. And the inquiry into the case after the consultation was an unusual move because the prosecution did not prove that the possibility could not be ruled out that there was a disability in using the main suspect's weapon at the time of the incident. The defense has been charged, especially when a question was asked by the doctor in this regard, which was forbidden by the trial court and any suspicion arising out of it was to raise reasonable doubt that the defendants suspected the circumstances. Was acquitted on the benefit of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer