Testimony of Section 13D Proof of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Both the witnesses of the prosecution who were police officers made contradictory statements on the point of preparation of counsel for the arrest and recovery of the accused and even the counsel's author. Denied them. The court's approach to defending its evidence was deemed unnecessary by law, and the weapons and ammunition recovered from the suspects were neither sealed on the spot, nor were the Ballistic Expert. Was sent for inspection and not even exhibited. The court and the accused were not shown even while recording their statements under section 342; CCP accused were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
