Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus MUHAMMAD HAROON KHAN


On the appeal of a government employee claiming restitution from his employment of a civil servant who was terminated without constitution and merit service in the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 21, the tribunal stated that the order to file an appeal against the reinstatement order Appeal for eligibility appointment. The employee was not admittedly challenged by the appellant although he claimed that he came in first place in the examination of such appointment and the second position was obtained by the public servant, therefore, approved by the service tribunal. The order in question cannot be challenged with an order which restores service personnel. The tribunal said that if the appointment of a public servant has hurt the appellant, he can certify it before the appropriate forum, in the case of non-maintenance of the service tribunal appeal, the appeal has been filed against the order. Can't justify doing that.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Ghazi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.