Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus STATE

Testimonies 302, 307 and 436 of the evidence were well explained in the FIR of the 16-hour delay in making a report to the police, which was not recorded after the initial investigation. The eye witnesses were natural witnesses to the incident and defended. His testimony was not corrupted by. The accused had been absconding for a long time and knew full well that he was facing trial in the murder case. The defense's plea was not proved by the accused. Medical evidence was not contradictory to the account. The motive was orally proven, along with documentary evidence, the conviction and sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court were upheld. solicitors from Sialkot lawyer