Find a Lawyer

SULTAN AHMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 307 The defendant was convicted of setting fire to the body of the complainant in an attempt to assassinate the accused and his accomplices were acquitted on the basis of the offense. The suspect was suspicious of the relationship. The accused's cousin, the sister prosecutor's witness and other witnesses in the prosecution, filed the case, which was the complainant's father and cousin, and should not have been located at the relevant time at the time of any reliance on the evidence of such witness. Not prompted and he was a disbeliever, only the prosecutor's witness who was the witness of the complainant / prosecutor in the field because he did not designate an independent witness, nor did the investigating officer collect any other available evidence in this case. Was tried and charged with a very serious motive in which the honor of the family Lotus was the suspect, but the prosecutor didn't try to prove the motive was that part of the allegedly used gun story was dug from the accused's bait, which was said to be unnatural at first. Because no one dug their ducks' hideout to hide the gun, the prosecutor's duty is to prove the matter beyond any means. It would not be safe to rely solely on the prosecutor's testimony after the allegations, after denying the status of reasonable doubt witnesses, recovery witnesses, and the complainant / prosecutor's witness, in these circumstances excluded the accused's conviction. And the accused was discharged. Guaranteed power of attorney advocate Choa Saiden Shah lawyer