PROVINCE OF SINDH versus M/S. ROYAL CONTRACTORS
The Partnership Act 1932 section 69 suit was filed by the unregistered firm Maintenance Plaintiff (Firm) when the plaintiff was not present at the time of filing the claim when he qualified in this case under Section 69, Partnership Act 1932. Was lacking The legal proceedings should be filed with the Partnership Firm under the Partnership Act, 1932, for the provision of section 69 of the Act is mandatory in the role, registration of the firm is a condition under which the institute suit court has no jurisdiction Will be. When this condition was not met, the proceeding of the trial, when any case established in contravention of section 69 of the Act, cannot be declared compulsory under the provisions of section 69 of the Act. The effect of the breach was that the case was bad at its inception and the court should treat it as it has not been filed. Registration after the firm will not be able to maintain the case so that the competent court can examine it from the date of registration when the law requires it to be done in a particular way, whether it should be in this way or non-registration. The whole process should be purely a question of law. At any time, even when such a request was not made in a written statement, the partnership company was not registered when it filed a lawsuit. Registration of such firm cannot verify suit filed by unregistered firm
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Nowshera Cantt lawyer