Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PERVEZ versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM AKHTAR

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Resolved by the tenant to resolve the rent determined by the rent controller by the rent controller. That the landlord's claimed rent was in fact. The tenant determined by the tenants was paying rent which was less than the rent. The controller of the rent control had instructed the tenant to submit the rent to the court which is Rs 2,000 a month, and the tenant was submitting. The controller was renting Rs 2,200 a month in search of it, the tenant failed to overcome such a search, so the result was finally filed by the landlord and succeeded. Has been directed to hand over the vacant landlord. This is how to find a tenant when collecting rent through it which is less than the amount fixed by the rent controller and which is obtained. Finally, the High Court could not satisfy why the rent controller was not collecting the rent due to the rent fixed by the tenant, thus deliberately paying less than the amount fixed by the rent controller. The default was set. As approved by the tenant during the approval of the constitutional application, by the competent jurisdiction tribunal (rent controller), and that is what is exclusively constitutional In the case of a jurisdiction, in the case of a constitutional application, the court was not entitled to refer. According to the order of the appellate forum, the tenant's removal will be meritorious when you need a advocate from Malakand lawyer