Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IFFATARASALEEM versus MUHAMMADKHURSHIDKHAN


Section 42 High Court Directives were issued to the Chief Secretary and Secretary Services that the respondents' case (related to their service case) is pending with them, which they have a three-month postponement by the High Court. The justification granted is due to justice and it does not suffer from any jurisdiction. The High Court does not have any jurisdiction to hear the Terms of Service dispute. Such a position was properly implemented following the High Court's decision under appeal, however, it has the jurisdiction to issue the directive that the department authority should resolve any dispute within time and time. Convinced that the departmental authority is controversial or refusing to approve the final order, the high court had set a three-month period to resolve the dispute, such time had already passed. This period has been extended for three more months to resolve the dispute.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Nilam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.