Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SPECTRUM COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, KARACHI versus NASIM BASHIR


Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R27 Option to Provide Additional Evidence, which was discovered by the Rent Controller after the decision was announced, provided additional evidence regarding a specific issue. Was gone - at such a stage was the discovery of fresh evidence. There is no scope to allow additional evidence; additional evidence sought to be presented by the Rent Controller Appeal Court was not denied, such evidence would not be required for the declaration of self-determination because additional Evidence consisted of documents that were not original but photostat copies were original. Such documents also cannot be allowed to be submitted under section 21 (3). According to the Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance, 1979, or O XLI, 27, the CPC tenant was not entitled to present the documents in question, as additional evidence.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.