Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL, POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sections 169, 170, and 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860) under section 440/378/148/149 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition in the case under the challan. Posted 154, CCPC's provisions and at the end of the investigation the investigating officer was obliged to make a full investigation or he would produce a final report under section 169, CRPC shows that the accused There was not enough material available against them and they had to be named in column number 2. Regarding the proposed form or that was to produce a report under consideration in section 11?, CCP, the accused had sufficient material against the persons named in Section 7373, the column number in the form mentioned under CRPC. And he was obliged to submit a report within fourteen. Therefore, in the days of registering a police officer, he was neither able to withhold the file nor could he be given such authority to perform his role. The court can only look at this case and agree or disagree with the report given by the investigating officer and decide whether to proceed on the matter or to postpone it pending a civil court opinion / ruling. Can pass an order. Despite the completion of investigation by the Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, Punjab / Investigation Officer, it was illegal and without legal authority to adjourn the matter till the decision of the civil court on the same property and consequently directed them to file back. Was done To the concerned police officer to present the challan in the trial court immediately patent advocate from Lower Dir lawyer