ADMINISTRATOR, ZILA COUNCIL, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD ZAMAN
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 8 and 11 Definition of the evidence found for the intoxicants The only public witness presented by the prosecution in this case did not support the prosecution's version, and the court declared it as objectionable. And there was no other independent witness from the public. It was submitted by the prosecution to prove that the accused was a drunk doctor who medically examined the accused, provided the final result whether the accused had taken alcohol or received a report from the Chemical Examiner. Should have been given or had not been exhibited before by the trial court, although the doctor had examined the accused, saying that he had formed his opinion based on the Chemical Examiner's prosecution report. He has failed to prove the matter beyond doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
