Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

The plaintiff offered to the plaintiff during the trial on a charge of fraudulent prosecution in a decision on the Arbitration Act 1373 section 13 affidavit that his witness swore an "Koran" So it was stated before the court that the criminal case was done. Plaintiff filed against the plaintiff, it was false, the plaintiff would have no objection to the trial, the defendant's offer was accepted by the plaintiff's witness, after recording the statements of the parties. The Appellate Court adjusts the decision, the trial court held that the plaintiff was not asked to agree to the offer made by the defendant / appellant when the offer was made by the plaintiff. He agreed with the hearing, otherwise proceedings were not taken to record defendant's statement at the trial. Even otherwise the error in separately recording the plaintiff's statements was merely an irregularity that would not be inaccurate in the law. The whole process of taking an oath and recording statements ask a advocate free from Sagri lawyer