NAZIR AHMAD versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 636363 and 4 364 Confession of evidence The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses was minimal and inconsistent and was not sufficient to warrant the conviction of the accused, but no witness appeared before the court, but his non-bailable warrant The court was brought in compliance. Proof of arrest was recorded on the same day where the accused was charged and the trial was also made on the same day, the accused's statement under section 2342, CCPC was recorded on the same day when the accused's trial was concluded. Was held and the court ruled without hearing the lawyer's arguments. In an unnecessary hurry to defend, the prosecution's trial failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt, the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court against the accused were granted, giving it the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Satyana Bangla lawyer