HAMID GUL versus THE STATE
Prohibited (Enforcement Limit) Order 1979 Article 16 does not comply with the end of certain offenses and its prohibition (enforcement limit) Order, used between Arts 16 (1) (a) and 16 (1) (b) of 1979. If no public place is committed in any way, it is not equal in the two categories, so in any case under Article without, it is admissible in any case, whereas Article, under Article or OR or Article 2. The punishment is enforceable only if it has been acted upon. Public Location [Mukhtar alias Caro v. State of 1988 PCRL J591; Maserat Shah v. State PLD 1990 Pres. 158 and MST Iqbal Bibi v. State of 1995 PCRL J1472.]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Hafizabad lawyer