Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD HANEEF versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/365/34 bail, the only evidence against the co-accused was the confessional statement of the co-accused, which was not a hearing sessions court before which the cases against the accused were pending. The hearing was that he was back. In this case, with their bail plea to the relevant Section H for transfer to the special court established under the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, it has not yet been decided that the cases against the accused will be prosecuted. Are or not There was currently no trial by any special court or session court before any court law and it was a clear case of difficulties where discretion would have been exercised in favor of the accused, in both cases the accused was in the circumstances. The bail was admitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Jamshoro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.