QAMAR ZAMAN SHINWARI versus S. NADIR SHAH GILLANI, ADVOCATE, KOHAT
Professional Practices Complaint against the Advocate From the documentary evidence presented on the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 41 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, RR 175 and 175 the record clearly proved that the relevant Advocate Local Government High. Was stationed at school and was pulling his salary. Regularly and he also received GP Fund and Advance Scooter Allowance from the Education Advocate Department, while presenting his documents to the Bar Council's Enrollment Committee, suppressing all such facts and making a false affidavit that neither Neither a government official nor a salaried person employed the Advocate since the Government School was violating Rr 175 & 175 A, the legal practitioners and bar council rules, 1976 by the Enrollment Committee for such material facts The lawyer's behavior in suppressing was extremely condemnable and unforgiving which is very high and Azz's position. Any behavior that violates the Code of Conduct must be strictly dealt with by the relevant Advocate, who has been found to have committed relevant professional misconduct, and thus is practically immediately subject to Section 41, Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Removed order on
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
