Find a Lawyer

LITAFAT NISREEN versus IMTIAZ ALI SHAH

Applicant for permission to sue for the recovery of dowry or articles of value in Pharma Papers in suits O-Papers O XXXIII, RR 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 through Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIII Filed by / Lady Anne Pharma Pakiris, more than ten years after the trial was dismissed by the trial court because of the petitioner's personal appearance, but her lawyer Not only was the applicant allowed to file a case in the pharma papyrus, the court entertained, but the statement was also filed The report notes XXXIII of the collector, in terms of R 6, PC issued the respondents / anti-party, but the Collector's report received in about 10 to 10 years. The application was rejected solely on the basis that it was not personally submitted pursuant to the requirement of R 3 of O XXXIII, the CPC was rejected on the ground that the application was rejected by O XXXXII, R. Was not presented in the manner specified by K2 and 3. The PC can only be made at an early stage and without issuing any notice to the opposition and to the government's profession, under Rule 6 of the AOXXIII, under Rule 5 of the CPC, The CPC, which deals with the rejection of the application, must be fined in nature. O XXXXII, strictly in rule 6 of CPC, had himself ruled that when the court found no reason for rejecting the application on any basis under R 5 of O XXXIII, it had to be contested. Should issue notices and issue notices by the government. On the contrary, Pakistan, top advocate family court from Moro lawyer