Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 435/336/353/186/109/324/147/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), a tense application for section 555, claimed itself against the person involved. Is quite another person. The trial court accordingly did not entertain the plea filed by it. No court law could deny the entertaining of a case or application at the level of its office and the office itself could not have made the same on presentation. Place was bound to happen. For the orders of the court which are supposed to pass legal orders according to this, the applicant was not indicated on such request, the applicants are not reflected in the designated order. Was made, as the case may be, the request on which the trial court was directed to pass the Speaking Order after hearing it and accordingly the prosecution's request was dealt with.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.