Section 20 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 354 of the Appellate Court of Appeal, after recording the evidence of the prosecution, found the offense under section 11 and 10/18 under the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Act) Ordinance 1979. And S. 354, sentenced and sentenced under PPC: it is argued that since the accused was convicted of a crime under the preventive code, this appeal could lie to the High Court, because the appeal. The deciding factor in the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction was not the crime for which he appellate jurisdiction. The accused were convicted, but their trial forum appealed that they were served before the Federal Shariat Court by section 20 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, not High. Earlier, the court appeals were returned to the competent court advising the accused [s]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
