Find a Lawyer

BAGGU versus RAHIMAN BIBI,

Conan e-Martyrdom Order 1984 Section 17 of the Law (10 of 1984), Art: 118 To prove the execution of this document, Burden of Documents for proving Burden will initially be on the party that relies on this document. The party would turn to the party accused of proving the facts of the fraud or improper influence. In order to prove the execution of the unconstitutional variable, defendant presented only two witnesses who claimed to have identified the defendant before the Revenue Officer. Lumbar but upon cross-examination, he admitted that he was not a lumberman, that none of the witnesses presented by the defendant belonged to any of the parties and claimed to have been present during the operation of the mutation, Both witnesses admitted that the plaintiff did not misrepresent anyone during the conversion proceedings. The testimony that he was a lumberjacker and did not mention the other witnesses in the mutiny proceedings despite his claim, would not make the two witnesses more credible when the presence of the plaintiff during the conversion proceedings was also suspicious. When the two witnesses admitted that they remained silent during the proceedings, the best evidence was Tehsildar, Patwari, or the mother of the women who allegedly altered their part. None of the witnesses who had inherited in favor of the defendant who was presented to prove the mutation in question had failed to substantiate the execution of the mutation. immigration advocates contact from Turbat lawyer