Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADSOHAIL versus GOVERNMENTOFN.W.F.P.

Border Engineering Service (Building and Road Department, Irrigation Department and Public Health Engineering Department) Rules 1973 Rules of Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 55 and 56 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) If the dispute arises. The dispute arose as the NWFP Engineering Services (Building and Roads Department, Irrigation Department and Public Health Engineering Department) Rules, 1973, and on the question of whether engineers working in the C&W Department and the Central Design Office belonged to one cadre or two. Was from the cadre. An appeal was filed before the service tribunal in the above departments in which it welcomed the government of the border government as a defendant without imposing any person working in the department, saying that the design office was not independent or different cadre. The Thava service tribunal accepted the above employee's argument and applied for leave to appeal against the service tribunal's order filed by the Government Border in accordance with the decision or order of the Supreme Court P Service Tribunal, which finalized such. Received a steady list of engineers working in the C&W Department and Central Design Office Artie applicants challenged the list was informed by the Department appeals to synyyrty list and then approach the service tribunal. Appeals that were rejected In this case, the applicants were allowed to appeal in the Supreme Court so that they could consider the question whether the applicant, on behalf of an employee of the Border Government, against an employee of the department against the border. There were no parties before the service tribunal in the appeal filed from. Matter and then before the Supreme Court, in which they are again free registration advocate from Abbottabad lawyer