ENGRO CHEMICALS PAKISTAN LIMITED versus TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN.
Effect of proceedings for completion of arbitration proceedings and extension of time for award of arbitral tribunal Act 1940 Section 28, which was implemented by the High Court after the expiry of the extended time period. , Before filing an application for extension of the court term. Section 28, the Arbitration Act, 1940, was granted the option to extend the time for award. Such discretion may be exercised by the court, whether the time has expired or not, and even after making the award periodically. It will be advised in section 28 of the Act that on one occasion but on more than one occasion the court may allow such an extension, but such discretion should be exercised with justice and not by the conduct of Parliament. It appears that both of them contributed to the delay in finalizing the arbitration proceedings. If there was no time grant for the respondent's written arguments and then the award announcement, to complete the arbitration proceedings and award the award, such a case would be baseless, which would not only cause severe difficulties and distress to the parties. But will not be in accordance with the law, the applicant filed a case for extension of time and the time has been extended for the next four months.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
