TAHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Sections 497 and 103 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 22 guaranteed, the police did not approve the search warrant before seeking the prohibited house (law enforcement). Provided in Article 22 of 1979, despite the residence of the accused in the city's densely populated area, the police did not share the two respected persons in the eligible area, violating the search process. Section 103 of the CC Report was not received despite a delay of 9 months, the FIR alleges that it did not sell the prohibited material. Was given the same limits (Head of Enforcement) Order 1979 under Article 3. Not attracted and the offense under Article 4 did not fall under the prohibited clause of section 497 (l), the CRPC accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kandhkot lawyer