RAMZAN ALI & CO. COTTON GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY, MIRPURKHAS versus GENERAL SECRETARY, EMPLOYEES UNION
Proceedings before the Labor Court under the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (xiii), 25A, 34, 34 (A), 43 and 49 on the application by the General Secretary of the Employees Union under the Labor Relations Section 34 The Advocate Challenge Advice Ordinance, 1969, saw a lawyer appear in the Labor Court on behalf of the employer, the applicant / employees union general secretary raised the objection against the employer's lawyer's motion on the basis that Labor He had not obtained permission under the section before appearing in court. 49 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (3) The petition filed by the General Secretary of the Employees Union under section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was guaranteed and protected under the law which was There can be no industrial dispute. Under the definition of section 2 (xiii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the required permission of the Labor Court under Sec. Guarantee of any law under On49 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 or guarantee of any right under any award or settlement under Section 25 or Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 There is no such thing as an industrial dispute. Article 43 or Section 34A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, shall not be barred from appearing for a lawyer in such a case; therefore, it may represent employers in this case without permission under section 49 (3). ? Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
