Find a Lawyer

XEN, HIGHWAY DIVISION, ABBOTTABAD versus HABIB-UR-RAHMAN

Section 56 Civil Procedure Code (v. 8 1908 O), O XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 was for the construction and blackpping of a particular section of road, in the contract due to its non-performance within the specified timeframe. In which some part was paid. As for the payment of the work and the share, the plaintiff had sued that despite his withdrawal from the contract, he could legally proceed with the work in accordance with the terms of his contract and the department was obliged to comply with the terms Pay against work. Under the agreement, the trial court refused to grant interim relief with the application for interim relief while the appellate court approved the interim relief under the terms of the application under OLXX, RRL & 2, CPC. Given: If the plaintiff's valid contractor is a litigant, the work already done on the road will be lost and the department will have to suffer a great deal of damage to the plaintiff in which case Can demand payment. With his bill against the work as well as any amount of any damages, if his plaintiff is harmed by the plaintiff, it cannot be considered irrevocable and unenforceable that the contract must be filed with the plaintiff before his suit is filed. The name has been redeemed. There will be no balance of convenience or disadvantage, even if the plaintiff has a good case, that his request for interim relief be granted by a court order preventing the public department from performing its public duties on the road. May be considered to halt any remaining construction work. In the circumstances of the trial, section 66 (d), the Special Relief Act, of77 of the terms denied family advocate from Ukba lawyer