Rule for Civil Code 1908 XVIII, R 8 [As amended by the Lahore High Court Notification dated 4 7 19421 and filed with the trial court for fresh recording of evidence in accordance with Section 115 law, different Eleven trial court decisions made by the plaintiff against the defendants were pending, in which the presiding officer only recorded the plaintiff's statement. While the remaining evidence in all these cases was recorded by someone else when the evidence was not transmitted by the presiding officer, they were bound, when every witness was examined, to every witness. To take the existing substance memorandum. Such a memorandum was to be signed by the presiding officer in his own hand or in his open court by the presiding officer and this record would form part of the presiding officer who supplied O XVIII, R 8, CPC appellate. Has not followed such procedures. The court rightly sought remand of the recording of fresh evidence as per law which did not constitute any irregularity in the case of remand by the appellate court against the order of the remand. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
