ATTA ULLAH versus THE STATE
Sections 2 (3) (b) and 22 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of Pakistan (Administration for Equity Property) Act, 1957, are treated as property owned, evacuated property. They purchased it only after March 19, 1947, after 1947, therefore, the property included in the property was their real estate, applicants purchased it on March 1, 1947, according to their entry. , Such a sale requires custodian verification which has never been verified. The question by the applicants was, in the definition of the definition of "real estate," included in section 2 (3) (b), Pakistan (Actual Property Administration) Act, 1957, therefore, there is no exception. Cannot take on the role of property. In question, especially when no application was made to a Custodian applicant under section 22 of the Act which was dismissed on the objection of the Custodian's certificate, such a decision was finalized. Was gone The petitioners have not previously filed any appeal or review against the dismissal of the case by the Appellate Court. , Was under mortgage in the possession of the applicants, if they advised, they could properly defend their possession as mortgage, properly as land, but not as owners to allow the appeal I was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sita Road lawyer