GHULAM FARID versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS
Section 497 (5) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11/10 (3) Abduction of bail, in a public place, with the accused in the light of day, according to the prosecution's story. He was riding the wagon and met witnesses who were familiar with his family, but at no point did he raise the alarm that he was being robbed, the accused claimed that he had married the alleged kidnapper, Who was pregnant for about 26 - 26 weeks at the time of recovery. Was with the consent of the purpose of marriage, then the first trial case against the accused was called or further investigated. The accused accused the complainant of displeasing the accused, which he was not pleased with because he was unhappy with the marriage by the sessions court. Since the case was Germany, the accused was neither baseless nor wrong and wrong
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Rajana lawyer
