Find a Lawyer

ADMINISTRATOR GENARAL OF AUQAF versus DISTRICT JUDGE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 203 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Article 115, Assumption of disputed application review, administration and management of property, property dedicated by the owners of the department It was claimed that the property was not taken by the defamatory property as its control and management was mistakenly taken by the department but the appeal was also affirmed when the property was taken as dedicated property. And the notification was issued on it, the proceedings of the proceedings should be passed only to the District Judge against the notification. Challenges can only be made by application and otherwise the following court orders and decisions were thus illegal and without any jurisdiction the constitutional petition was directed against the proceedings of the civil suit, under Article 203 of the Constitution. The High Court was empowered to remove jurisdictional defenses and to fix ASI. Such decisions were also automatically granted by the High Court to decide on the decisions and decisions of the High Court, which were under the High Court. Not only the decisions rendered by the courts and under Articles 199 and 203 of the Constitution but also Section 115, CPC Also have sufficient powers to set aside orders, decisions or decrees. The subordinate court, with or without jurisdiction over which the court has no jurisdiction, whose decisions and orders were binding on the courts and the order to reject them, made these courts illegal and unlawful. Was declared legal. Conditions immigration advocates email from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer