Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH AWAN versus CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION ZONE, BAHAWALPUR

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Promotion Petitioners (Government Employees) who joined the pre-service rather than the respondents were their senior as the sub divisional clerk on the duty of junior clerks respondents initially in 1987. As progress was made, ignoring the applicants, the proposed department examination was finished this year while the applicant had succeeded in the same period while the respondents were regularly promoted from the date of appointment. And was regularly promoted to Account Clerks, which was implemented 29 1990 1 It was from 990 in which the applicants passed the examination. 1990, was promoted on a regular basis on 29th 1990 1990, the same day, the respondents were further promoted as the applicants of the Account Clerk confirming the failure of the service tribunal did not suspect that the Junior Clerks Respondents were senior but they passed the departmental examination, the promotion in 1990, where the respondents were cleared, in 1987, the candidates were, thus, properly promoted under the patronage of the applicants. Had not yet passed the required departmental examination and were not entitled to the service tribunal. Nadgan passed the Department Examination in 1990 and was promoted, respondents were eligible for further promotion as Accounts Clerks, as they spent 3 years on account of respondents' development as Account Clerks on 29 9 1990. Mandatory services were, therefore, not open to exceptions, promoting applicants as everyone. top advocates from Nilam lawyer