Find a Lawyer

YAR BAZ KHAN versus LAL NAWAZ

Section 54 of the Property Act 1882 was nothing to prove that the sale transaction by the attorney was considered by the attorney and went to his principal. Was the legal requirement for the transfer of ownership of immovable property to immovable property for the purpose of executing a sale transaction, that is, the ownership of the property in which the title was taken or the effect by the person holding the title had gone. After the sale consideration is approved, and thirdly, with the transfer, the possession is transmitted, the registration of the documents itself will not provide proof of the elements that must be present prior to implementation and registration. Is. Neither the witness box for sale nor his attorney brought the record in his favor to show that the sale was influenced by his principal, nor did he make any attempt to show that he Has considered the issue of sale upon receipt of the sale, which is illegal in the sale and was not capable of being impacted by any person, and furthermore, such sale is not even considered. was done. Pregnancy sale transactions with both legal and factual inherent weakness could not be sustained and could not be legally enforced power of attorney advocate Dudial lawyer