Find a Lawyer

A. RASUL versus VICE-CHANCELLOR

In the exam hall, the mismanaged candidate of the examiners was allowing another candidate to copy from his reply book, then the answer books of both the students were also seized, which could be confiscated, but the authority adopted a soft opinion and both candidates got the results. Waiting for the paper to be completed. Examination Disciplinary Committee The Examination Disciplinary Committee's decision, after the necessary inquiry, canceled the relevant papers of both the students, the High Court compared the relevant papers and the material on record and found that the constitutional petition was merit. Is vacant and should not have dared to bring the matter to the High Court in view of the material on the record candidate and should have been satisfied with the cancellation of the same paper, which in such circumstances would have involved the acquisition of the University. , The students involved were responsible and should have been rebellious, when the facts were appealed against them. If no material was recorded, indicating that the candidate's involvement with a member of the academic staff was illegal in order to benefit another student. The fact is that the candidate got the best score in the other papers and there was no point in excluding him from the charge of mismanagement. The High Court itself retained the results of the Examination Disciplinary Committee while maintaining a moderate view, but directed that the remaining papers of the candidate for the pending examinations be canceled even though it should not be made rusty. The future is not ruined at all. Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 us immigration advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer