Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR ELAHI versus IRSHAD BEGUM

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 and Schedule: Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 9 and AXXIII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition for three cases; recovery of dowry articles; wife For the care of the daughter; and for the care of the daughter, a lawsuit was filed against the applicant by his resident wife; all three cases were decided by the district judge in the amended jurisdiction over the court's decisions. The requests for review applications were so decided that the petition filed for the recovery of her dowry articles was brought to the forefront of the De Novo case. Had been remanded for seven. A review request against the restraining order was rejected. Valid legal counsel for the parties agreed that the unwanted decisions presented by the amending court were before the Quorum Nan Judges, before the forum's lawyer agreed that the defamatory decisions be kept separately and the three. The cases should be remanded to the trial court. In light of the judgment of the Revolutionary Court, the High Court obtained the remand of all three cases to make the same decision in the terms of the decision of the amending court (District Judge), with the consent of the parties. ) Parties presented on a specific date will be entitled to extend all points they have access to and all questions raised before the court must be dealt with strictly in accordance with the law. immigration advocates email from Dadakhel lawyer