PAINDA KHAN versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ordered the cancellation of the sale of the land for the collector to consider the request of the seller, which was a mutation transfer. Violation of MLR 115 collector's order was upheld in appeal and review The seller was still alive The seller's transaction was not self-challenged The vendor's wife had no right or interest in the land on which it was located. So, he had no locus. Neither can the transaction party to challenge the authenticity of the motion to cancel the change of sale, on the basis that it is also in violation of the provisions of MLR No. 115 which the seller's spouse The request filed by was not filed by a competent person. And, on the basis of which the order was granted, the appeal and revision validity were absolutely illegal and without legal authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Abbottabad lawyer
